[2019] KEHC 10463 (KLR)
The court found that there are multiple Wills presented for the deceased, with inconsistencies in the lists of beneficiaries and assets, and no clear consensus among the parties. The applicant failed to provide written consents from all beneficiaries and did not strictly follow the Will in the proposed distribution....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 10463 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: John Maina Mbugua; Respondent: Joseph Kimani Mbugua; Respondent: Mary Wangui Maina; Respondent: Joseph Kimani Maina
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2556 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Protests Against Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- Matter not determined; referred for hearing and determination by another court within the Family Division.
- Legal Topics
- Probate and Administration, Validity of Wills, Confirmation of Grant, Beneficiary Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Maina Mbugua
Applicant
Joseph Kimani Mbugua
Respondent
Mary Wangui Maina
Respondent
Joseph Kimani Maina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Protests Against Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Will(s) presented are valid and which is the operative Will of the deceased.
- 2 Whether the list of beneficiaries and assets is accurate and consistent.
- 3 Whether the proposed modes of distribution comply with the valid Will or the law of intestacy.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there are multiple Wills presented for the deceased, with inconsistencies in the lists of beneficiaries and assets, and no clear consensus among the parties. The applicant failed to provide written consents from all beneficiaries and did not strictly follow the Will in the proposed distribution. There are substantive protests regarding the validity of the Will(s), the appointment of the executor, and the fairness of the proposed distribution. Given these unresolved disputes and the fact that the presiding judge is on transfer, the court declined to proceed with the confirmation of grant and directed that the matter be heard and determined by another court within the...
Court Disposition
Matter not determined; referred for hearing and determination by another court within the Family Division.
Orders
- The matter shall be heard and determined in any court within the Family Division.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
44 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 2556 OF 2008
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MBUGUA KIMANI (DECEASED)
RULING
FACTS
The deceased Mbugua Kimani died testate on the 27th April 2006.
The Applicants filed petition for probate with Will annexed in Thika Chief Magistrate’s Court and later in High Court on 5th November 2008. Annexed to the application isWill of 29th March 2005.
The Grant of Probate was issued on 5th March 2008 by L.J.Rawalto John Maina Mbugua of P.O.Box 1023 Thika as Executor and amended by Hon J W.Musyoka on 30th January 2013( In the Will he is not named as Executor and there are no written consents from beneficiaries that he is the Executor of the Will.)
On 16th March 2010, John Maina Mbugua filed Summons for Confirmation of Grant of Probate issued on 5th March 2008. He listed the beneficiaries of the estate of the deceased (but not according to the Will or the Petition for grant of Probate) and the list of assets that comprise of the estate of the deceased and the proposed mode of distribution which is not also according to the Will.
On 14th October 2018 another summons for confirmation of grant was filed with different lists of beneficiaries , assets and proposed mode of distribution.
Both summons for confirmation applications do not contain written consents from beneficiaries on distribution of the deceased’s estate.
Joseph Kimani Mbugua by letter 21st February 2014 declined consent to the summons for confirmation and protested.
Joseph Kimani Maina filed Further Affidavit of Protest against confirmation of grant filed on 10th December 2014.
Joseph Kimani Mbugua filed Affidavit of Protest against confirmation of grant on 6th November 2014.
Mary Wangui Maina filed Affidavit of Protest against Confirmation of grant on 6th November 2014.
Joseph Kimani Maina Filed Affidavit of Protest against Confirmation of Grant on 6th November 2014.
PROCEEDINGS
On 20th September 2016, 3 members of the deceased’s family attended Court; namely Joseph Kimani Maina , Mary Wangare Mbugua and Joseph Kimani Mbugua.
On 5th October 2016 Joseph Kimani Mbugua testified on the basis of his protest to the summons for confirmation; that the administrator’s claim to purchase of some properties was not confirmed, he did not file accounts on management of the estate, he left out some assets that are part of deceased’s estate and the proposed sharing of the estate is not fair.
In cross-examination; he stated that the Will was not by the deceased, it did not appoint the Executor, he was not invited and/or consulted on the appointment of Executor among other issues raised.
On 16th November 2016, Joseph Kimani, John Maina, Nganga Mbugua, Mary Wangui, Joseph Kimani, Wilson Mbugua and Moses Irungu attended Court and sought the Will be translated first before each party could consent or object to the Will.
On 29th October 2018 the beneficiaries attended Court and some objected to the Will and others agreed to it. The Court was presented with the following Wills;
a) Will of 29th March 2005 (typed and is in English)
b) Will of 20th January 2001(handwritten and Kikuyu)
c) Will of 20th January2001(typed and in English)
DISPOSITION
1. The matter is partheard on protests against summons for confirmation of grant applications.
2. There are more than 1Will of the deceased and it is not clear which of them legally is the valid Will of the deceased.
3. The List of beneficiaries of the deceased’s estate is not consistent and confirmed; it is different in different documents.
4. There are protests filed contesting lists of assets that comprise the deceased’s estate.
5. There are protests Filed contesting the proposed modes of distribution of deceased’s estate.
6. There are objections to the Will(s) and modes of distribution and whether the estate should be distributed as per the valid Will of deceased or as an intestate estate.
7. This Court is on transfer and cannot hear and determine the matter.
8. The matter shall be heard and determined in any court within the Family Division.
DELIVERED SIGNED & DATED IN OPEN COURT ON 22ND JANUARY 2019.
M. W. MUIGAI
JUDGE-FAMILY DIVISION
IN THE PRESENCE OF:
NGANGA EPHRAIM MBUGUA – SON OF DECEASED
JOHN MAINA – SON OF DECEASED
MARY WANGUI MBUGUA- DAUGHTER OF DECEASED
JOSEPH KIMANI MBUGUA- SON OF DECEASED
WILSON RURO- ABSENT