[2019] KEHC 9789 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 9789 (KLR)

The court found that there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the transfers of Nyanyuki/Marura Block 8/409 and 8/2177 to Sabella Gaiti M’Inoti were valid gifts inter vivos from the deceased. The alleged purchase of L.R. Ntirimiti/776 by Gerrishon Gituma was also not substantiated. Consequently, these...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 9789 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Alfred Mugambi M’Inui; Objector: Sabella Gaiti M’Inoti; Objector: Japhet Kinyua; Objector: Franklin Muriungi; Objector: Charity Nkirote Bundi; Protestor: Rebecca Nkatha M’Inoti; Protestor: Festus Mbaabu M’Inoti; Protestor: Johnson Kithinji Inoti; Protestor: Mackline Kangai Kaimenyi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 33 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Grant confirmed; estate to be distributed per Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act.
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Polygamous Estates, Distribution of Land, Proof of Gift Inter Vivos, Administration of Estates
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Polygamous Estates Distribution of Land Proof of Gift Inter Vivos Administration of Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alfred Mugambi M’Inui

Petitioner

Sabella Gaiti M’Inoti

Objector

Japhet Kinyua

Objector

Franklin Muriungi

Objector

Charity Nkirote Bundi

Objector

Rebecca Nkatha M’Inoti

Protestor

Festus Mbaabu M’Inoti

Protestor

Johnson Kithinji Inoti

Protestor

Mackline Kangai Kaimenyi

Protestor

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the transfers of Nyanyuki/Marura Block 8/409 and 8/2177 to Sabella Gaiti M’Inoti were valid gifts inter vivos or estate property.
  2. 2 Whether the purchase of L.R. Ntirimiti/776 by Gerrishon Gituma was proved and valid.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate mode of distribution of the deceased’s estate among the beneficiaries, considering the polygamous nature of the family.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the transfers of Nyanyuki/Marura Block 8/409 and 8/2177 to Sabella Gaiti M’Inoti were valid gifts inter vivos from the deceased. The alleged purchase of L.R. Ntirimiti/776 by Gerrishon Gituma was also not substantiated. Consequently, these properties were deemed part of the estate. The court confirmed the grant and ordered that the estate be distributed in accordance with Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act, which governs the distribution of estates of polygamous intestates. The court adopted a mode of distribution that included all beneficiaries, both sons and daughters, and provided detailed allocations for each...

Court Disposition

Grant confirmed; estate to be distributed per Section 40 of the Law of Succession Act.

Orders

  • Nyanyuki/Marura Block 8/409 and 8/2177 declared estate property and to be distributed as ordered.
  • L.R. Ntirimiti/776 declared estate property and to be distributed as ordered.