[2023] KEHC 22630 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 22630 (KLR)

The court found that the orders sought in the application dated June 7, 2023 had already been granted in the earlier ruling of February 8, 2023, which rectified the certificate of confirmation of grant as proposed. The court emphasized that it possesses inherent powers to rectify a grant without being formally...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 22630 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Silas Kithinji Inoti; Applicant: Japhet Muthuri Inoti; Respondent: John Muthomi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 308 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
Application dated June 7, 2023 disallowed; parties to comply with orders issued on February 8, 2023.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Succession, Rectification of Grant, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Rectification of Grant Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Silas Kithinji Inoti

Applicant

Japhet Muthuri Inoti

Applicant

John Muthomi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the application dated June 7, 2023 for rectification of grant was necessary in light of previous court orders.
  2. 2 Whether the court has inherent powers to rectify a grant without being formally moved.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders sought in the application dated June 7, 2023 had already been granted in the earlier ruling of February 8, 2023, which rectified the certificate of confirmation of grant as proposed. The court emphasized that it possesses inherent powers to rectify a grant without being formally moved, as provided by section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules. The court held that the subsequent application was unnecessary and contrary to the efficient use of judicial time. The proper course for the applicants was to extract the grant in accordance with the existing court order, not to file repetitive applications.

Court Disposition

Application dated June 7, 2023 disallowed; parties to comply with orders issued on February 8, 2023.

Orders

  • The application dated June 7, 2023 is disallowed.
  • Matter to be mentioned on December 14, 2023 to confirm compliance with the court orders issued on February 8, 2023.