[2022] KEHC 14510 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 14510 (KLR)

The court held that the power to rectify a grant under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules is strictly limited to correcting minor errors such as names, descriptions, or the time and place of death. The applicants' request to redistribute various assets...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 14510 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joel Kithinji M’Inoti; Applicant: Francis Gikundi M’Inoti
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 305 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Law of Succession Act, Probate and Administration Rules, Errors in Grant, Redistribution of Assets
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Law of Succession Act Probate and Administration Rules Errors in Grant Redistribution of Assets

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joel Kithinji M’Inoti

Applicant

Francis Gikundi M’Inoti

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the court can rectify a grant to allow redistribution of various assets under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act.
  2. 2 Whether the errors alleged by the applicants fall within the scope of rectification as provided by law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the power to rectify a grant under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules is strictly limited to correcting minor errors such as names, descriptions, or the time and place of death. The applicants' request to redistribute various assets constitutes a substantial issue that falls outside the scope of rectification and would require a proper application for review or appeal. The omission or redistribution of assets is not a minor error and cannot be addressed through rectification. Consequently, the summons for rectification was found to be unmerited and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Summons for rectification dated March 15, 2022 is dismissed.