[2018] KEHC 1044 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 1044 (KLR)

The court found that Charity Kairigo, as a former wife, could be considered a dependant under Section 29 of the Law of Succession Act, given evidence that she continued to depend on the estate property. The court also recognized that certain properties had been transferred as gifts inter vivos and should be excluded...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 1044 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Geoffrey Mworia M’Itwathuku; Objector: Charity Kairigo; Interested Party: John Wycliffe M. Gituma; Interested Party: Margaret K. Gituma
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 113 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Grant confirmed; estate distributed as per court's orders; no order as to costs.
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Dependant Status, Gifts Inter Vivos, Distribution of Estate, Land Subdivision
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Intestate Succession Dependant Status Gifts Inter Vivos Distribution of Estate Land Subdivision

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Mworia M’Itwathuku

Respondent

Charity Kairigo

Objector

John Wycliffe M. Gituma

Interested Party

Margaret K. Gituma

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the objector is a wife of the deceased for purposes of distribution of the estate.
  2. 2 How the estate of the deceased should be distributed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Charity Kairigo, as a former wife, could be considered a dependant under Section 29 of the Law of Succession Act, given evidence that she continued to depend on the estate property. The court also recognized that certain properties had been transferred as gifts inter vivos and should be excluded from the estate for distribution purposes. Applying Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act, the court ordered that the remaining estate be distributed equally among the surviving children, with specific parcels allocated to individual beneficiaries as per the evidence and the law. The grant was confirmed in these terms, and no order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

Grant confirmed; estate distributed as per court's orders; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • NTHIMBIRI/IGOKI/576 (0.40 ha) to M’Arimi Mtuathuku wholly.
  • NTHIMBIRI/IGOKI/577 (0.40 ha) to Charity Kairigo wholly.