[2021] KEHC 8502 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8502 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's claim of fraudulent rectification was unsubstantiated, as both parties were heard before the grant was rectified and the inclusion of Godffrey Githinji as a beneficiary was consistent with the applicant's own documents. However, the court determined that the sale of LR. NO....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8502 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Murungi Maingi; Respondent: Moffat Kimathi Samwel; Respondent: Ann Mukuba Ndubi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 615 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Application for revocation of grant dismissed; title deed to 2nd Respondent revoked; property to revert to estate for equal distribution among beneficiaries.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Fraudulent Transfer of Property, Distribution of Estate, Intermeddling With Estate, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Revocation of Grant Fraudulent Transfer of Property Distribution of Estate Intermeddling With Estate Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Murungi Maingi

Applicant

Moffat Kimathi Samwel

Respondent

Ann Mukuba Ndubi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the rectification and distribution of the estate was conducted fraudulently and in contravention of court orders.
  2. 2 Whether the sale and transfer of LR. NO. ABOTHIGUCHI/KARIENE/1887 to the 2nd Respondent was lawful and valid.
  3. 3 Whether the title deed issued to the 2nd Respondent should be revoked and the property reverted to the estate for proper distribution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's claim of fraudulent rectification was unsubstantiated, as both parties were heard before the grant was rectified and the inclusion of Godffrey Githinji as a beneficiary was consistent with the applicant's own documents. However, the court determined that the sale of LR. NO. ABOTHIGUCHI/KARIENE/1887 by the 1st Respondent to the 2nd Respondent was unlawful, as it occurred before confirmation of the grant and without authority as a personal representative. The title deed issued to the 2nd Respondent was therefore obtained irregularly and could not be protected by law. The court held that the estate should be distributed equally among the rightful...

Court Disposition

Application for revocation of grant dismissed; title deed to 2nd Respondent revoked; property to revert to estate for equal distribution among beneficiaries.

Orders

  • Summons for revocation dated 08th September, 2020 is dismissed.
  • Title deed for LR. NO. ABOTHIGUCHI/KARIENE/1887 issued to Ann Mukuba Ndubi is revoked.