[2022] KEHC 9903 (KLR)
The court found that Lawrence Mwebia, as administrator, had failed to comply with previous court orders regarding the confirmation of grant and distribution of the estate, and had intermeddled with the estate by disposing of parts of it without authority. This conduct rendered him unfit to continue as administrator....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 9903 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lawrence Mwebia; Respondent: Margaret Gakii Muriithi; Respondent: Julius Mwituria Mipwi; Respondent: Lucy Gaicugi Kaburu; Respondent: Celina Kathure Mutwiri; Respondent: Naomi Ntibuka Barton; Respondent: Moses Mugambi Mutwiri; Respondent: Faith Gatwiri Mutwiri; Respondent: Alex Munene Mutwiri
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 65 of 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Removal of Administrator and Rectification of Register
- Outcome
- Application allowed; Lawrence Mwebia removed as administrator; all subdivisions and transfers cancelled; land registers rectified; costs to applicant.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Removal of Administrator, Intermeddling With Estate, Rectification of Land Register, Distribution of Estate, Trust Land Determination
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lawrence Mwebia
Applicant
Margaret Gakii Muriithi
Respondent
Julius Mwituria Mipwi
Respondent
Lucy Gaicugi Kaburu
Respondent
Celina Kathure Mutwiri
Respondent
Naomi Ntibuka Barton
Respondent
Moses Mugambi Mutwiri
Respondent
Faith Gatwiri Mutwiri
Respondent
Alex Munene Mutwiri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Removal of Administrator and Rectification of Register
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Lawrence Mwebia should be removed as administrator of the deceased's estate due to intermeddling and non-compliance with court orders.
- 2 Whether the subdivisions and transfers of L.R. No. Abogeta/Nkachie/33 and Land No. Nkuene/Ngonyi/273 should be cancelled and the registers rectified.
- 3 Whether purchasers from the applicant have any rights under the law of succession.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Lawrence Mwebia, as administrator, had failed to comply with previous court orders regarding the confirmation of grant and distribution of the estate, and had intermeddled with the estate by disposing of parts of it without authority. This conduct rendered him unfit to continue as administrator. The court held that all subdivisions and transfers of the estate properties made in contravention of court orders were invalid and ordered the rectification of the land registers to revert the properties to the deceased's name. The court further held that purchasers from the applicant had no protection under the law of succession and could only seek remedies against the...
Court Disposition
Application allowed; Lawrence Mwebia removed as administrator; all subdivisions and transfers cancelled; land registers rectified; costs to applicant.
Orders
- Lawrence Mwebia is removed as administrator of the deceased's estate.
- Cherina Kanugu and Gervasio Kithinji Thuranira remain as joint administrators.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
In re Estate of M’Munyua M’Muguongo (Deceased) (Succession Cause 65 of 1993) [2022] KEHC 9903 (KLR) (7 July 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 9903 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Succession Cause 65 of 1993
TW Cherere, J
July 7, 2022
IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF M’MUNYUA M’MUGUONGO alias IKUNYUA MUGUONGO (DECEASED)
Between
Lawrence Mwebia
Petitioner
and
Margaret Gakii Muriithi
1st Respondent
Julius Mwituria Mipwi
2nd Respondent
Lucy Gaicugi Kaburu
3rd Respondent
Celina Kathure Mutwiri
4th Respondent
Naomi Ntibuka Barton
5th Respondent
Moses Mugambi Mutwiri
6th Respondent
Faith Gatwiri Mutwiri
7th Respondent
Alex Munene Mutwiri
8th Respondent
Ruling
Background 1. By a ruling dated 21st June, 2018, Ongínjo J. made the following orders:1)Lawrence Mwebia, Cherina Kanugu and Gervasio are appointed joint administrators to estate. L.R. No. Abogeta/Nkachie/33 will be held in trust in the joint names of the petitioner/Respondent and Gerasio Kithinji Thuranira pending determination as to whether the same was trust land.2)Land No. Nkuene/Ngonyi/273 be distributed equally amongst the children of the deceased person herein unless otherwise agreed3)Certificate of confirmation to issue
2. In the same ruling, the judge noted that deceased was survived by the following:WidowKajuju MunyuaChildreni.Cherina Kanuguii.Zabera Mwaromoiii.Rose Gatwiriiv.Lawrence Mwebiav.Mark Kinyuru
3. I have considered the application in the light of the affidavits on record and submissions by the parties. The firm of Okubasu, Munene & Kazungu LLP Advocates be granted leave to come on record after judgment.
4. From the court record and the parties’ affidavits, I note that the following issues are not disputed:1)Lawrence Mwebia, Cherina Kanugu and Gerasio Kithinji Thuranira have neither obtained the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant in terms of the court’s orders issued on 21st June, 20182)Land No. Nkuene/Ngonyi/273 has not been distributed equally amongst the children of the deceased person as ordered by this court on 21st June, 2018. 3)There is no evidence that a determination has been made concerning whether L.R. No. Abogeta/Nkachie/33 is trust land4)Some parties including the Applicant have intermeddled with the estate of the deceased
5It is to be remembered that court orders are not made in vain. This was appreciated by Ojwang, J (as he then was) in B vs. Attorney General [2004] 1 KLR 431 that:“The Court does not, and ought not to be seen to, make Orders in vain; otherwise the Court would be exposed to ridicule, and no agency of the Constitutional order would then be left in place to serve as a guarantee for legality, and for the rights of all people.
6. This court frowns upon parties that do not comply with court orders. If for any reason the parties had difficulty in complying with the court orders, the honourable thing to do was to come back to court and explain the difficulties faced by the need to comply with the order for the reason that once a Court order is made in a suit, the same is valid unless set aside on review or on appeal.
7. The totality of the evidence on record leaves no doubt in my mind that the Applicant is the cause of the mess in this cause for the reason that he has intermeddled by disposing off parts of the estate and is therefore underserving of continuing being an administrator to this estate.
8. In the end, summons dated 09th March, 2022 is considered and it is hereby ordered:1)Lawrence Mwebia is hereby removed from being an administrator to deceased’s estate thereby leaving Cherina Kanugu and Gervasio Kithinji Thuranira as the joint administrators of the estate2)All titles arising from subdivisions of L.R. No. Abogeta/Nkachie/33 and Land No. Nkuene/Ngonyi/273 are hereby cancelled3)An order is hereby made for rectification of the register for LR No. Abogeta/Nkachie/33 and LR No. Nkuene/Ngonyi/273 reverting them to the name of M’Munyua M’Muguongoalias Ikunyua Muguongo (deceased) for purposes of distribution4)Cherina Kanugu and Gervasio Kithinji Thuranira shall obtain the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant and proceed to distribute the estate in terms of this court’s orders issued on 21st June, 2018 except that L.R. No. Abogeta/Nkachie/33 will be held in trust in the joint names of the Cherina Kanugu and pending determination as to whether the same is trust land.5)The rights of the 1st to 3rd Respondents who claim to have purchased land from the Applicant and any other purchaser are not protected by the law of succession and their claim lies in a claim against the respective vendors6)Applicant shall bear the costs of this application7. Mention on 19 th October, 2022 to confirm distribution of the estate
DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 07 TH DAY OF JULY, 2022T. W. CHEREREJUDGEAppearancesCourt Assistant - KinotiFor Applicant - M/s Okubasu, Munene & Kazungu LLP AdvocatesFor 1 to 3rd Respondents - M/s Charles Kariuki & Kiome Associates AdvocateFor 4th to 8th Respondents - N/A for Kiogora Mugambi & Co. Advocates