[2019] KEHC 9561 (KLR)
The court found that the sons of the deceased had already benefitted from inter vivos gifts of land from the deceased. The remaining parcel, LR No. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3559, should therefore be distributed equally among the daughters of the deceased or their survivors. The court held that Simon Macharia, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 9561 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Muthuri M'Nkanatha; Respondent: Jane Karuki Nkanatha; Respondent: Margaret Nyoroka; Respondent: Stella Kirumba
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 32 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Protest
- Outcome
- Protest allowed. The proposed distribution by the petitioner is set aside. LR No. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3559 to be distributed equally among the daughters of the deceased or their survivors. Simon Macharia to vacate the suit land within 30 days.
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Distribution of Estate, Inheritance Rights of Daughters, Confirmation of Grant, Inter Vivos Gifts, Rights of Grandchildren
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Muthuri M'Nkanatha
Applicant
Jane Karuki Nkanatha
Respondent
Margaret Nyoroka
Respondent
Stella Kirumba
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Protest
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed mode of distribution by the petitioner was fair and in accordance with the law of succession.
- 2 Whether daughters of the deceased are entitled to inherit from the estate equally with sons.
- 3 Whether Simon Macharia, the petitioner's son, is entitled to inherit directly from the deceased or only through his father.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sons of the deceased had already benefitted from inter vivos gifts of land from the deceased. The remaining parcel, LR No. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3559, should therefore be distributed equally among the daughters of the deceased or their survivors. The court held that Simon Macharia, the petitioner's son, was not entitled to inherit directly from the deceased but only through his father, the petitioner. His occupation and construction on LR 3559 was unauthorized, as it occurred after the deaths of both the deceased and his widow, and before the estate was distributed by the court. The court emphasized the equal inheritance rights of daughters under the Law of...
Court Disposition
Protest allowed. The proposed distribution by the petitioner is set aside. LR No. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3559 to be distributed equally among the daughters of the deceased or their survivors. Simon Macharia to vacate the suit land within 30 days.
Orders
- LR No. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3559 shall be distributed equally among the daughters of the deceased or their survivors.
- Simon Macharia shall vacate LR 3559 within 30 days of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
66 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 32 OF 2013
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF M’NKANAHA M’THIURU (DECEASED)
DAVID MUTHURI M’NKANATHA ………………………..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
JANE KARUKI NKANATHA………………………………1ST PROTESTOR
MARGARET NYOROKA……………………..……………2ND PROTESTOR
STELLA KIRUMBA………………………………………..3RD PROTESTOR
RULING
The deceased M’Nkanata M’Thuiru died on 4th June 2001 as a result of Hepatic Failure. He was aged 70 years. He was survived by one widow namely Monica Mwithiabi and:-
1. David Muthuri – son
2. Mercy Kinya – Daughter in law
3. Jane Karuki – Daughter
4. John Mutuma – Grandson – adult
5. Margaret Nyoroka M’Mbori – daughter – married.
6. Tabitha Muthoni M’Nkanata – Daughter at home
The deceased died and left the following assets registered in his name:-
1. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3562
2. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3561
3. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3560
4. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3559
5. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3558
Grant of Administration was made to David Muthuri M’Nkanata on 15th day of October 2013. Summons for confirmation of grant was subsequently filed on 13th March 2018 and it was supported by the affidavit of David Muthuri M’Nkanata who at paragraph 5(a) to (e) distributed the estate as follows:-
1. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3558 – to Mercy Kinya -0. 488 Ha
2. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3559 – 0. 810 Ha to:-
a) Jane Karuki -0. 202 ha
b) Mercy Kinya – 0. 303 Ha
c) David Muthuri – 0. 303
d) Monica Mwitiabi – life interest on Mercy Kinya, Jane Karuki and David Muthuri’s portions on LR 3559
3. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3560 – 0. 472 to go to John Mutuma
4. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3561-0. 506 Ha to go to David Muthuri Mkanata absolutely
5. Abothuguchi/Katheri/3562 -0. 405 Ha to go to Dominic Murithi
Margaret Nyoroka by an affidavit sworn on 27th March 2018 protested to mode of distribution proposed by David Muthuri on the ground that she is daughter to the deceased and therefore entitled to inherit from the estate. Further that Simon Macharia Muthuri was son to the petitioner and should therefore inherit through the petitioner and not directing from the deceased who is his grandfather.
Stella Kirumba in her affidavit in protest Sworn in March 2018 said she is daughter to Tabitha Muthoni – deceased – who was daughter to the deceased herein. She said she grew up under the care of the deceased and expected to be considered as a beneficiary. She said that the petitioner in his proposed mode of distribution was not agreeable to her as she had not been provided for. She said that herself and her aunt Jane Karuki and her grandmother lived on LR 3559. She said the son to the petitioner; one Simon Macharia Muthuri entered LR 3559 without permission in 2013 and constructed a semi-permanet house which he considers his home. She proposed that LR Abothuguchi/3559 be distributed equally to herself, Jane Karuki and Margaret Nyoroka.
Jane Karuki M’Nkanata also swore an affidavit on 27. 3.2018 protesting manner of distribution. She also suggested that LR Abothuguchi/Katheri/3559 be distributed to her, Stella Kirumba and Margaret Nyoroka Kiambi to share equally. Jane Karuki in cross examination confirmed that David Muthuri the petitioner had been given 2 acres of land by the deceased. To the family of Nkonge – deceased – husband to Mery Kinya was also given over one acre. She said that 3rd portion was given to Dominic Murithi- one acre.
That the 4th portion of one acre was given to John Mutuma and 2 acres in 5th portion was left registered in the name of the deceased. She said Simon Macharia the son of the petitioner has put up a stone house on the portion that remained in the deceased person’s name. She said the deceased person’s widow didn’t give the portion to Simon Macharia. She said the 5th portion that remained for the deceased should be given to the daughters of the deceased. She said she was not satisfied with 0. 50 acres. She said that her views were not accepted at the family meeting. She said Stella Kirumba was her deceased sisters Tabitha Muthoni’s daughter. She said that John Mutuma was also son to the late Tabitha Muthoni. She said land given to John Mutuma was not on account of his mother. She said Stella was brought up by the deceased from childhood.
She said Mercy Nkirote was daughter to Tabitha Muthoni. She gave names of Tabitha Muthonis children:-
1. Stella Kirumba
2. John Mutuma
3. Mercy Nkirote
4. Susan Kinanu
Jane Karuki said the deceased shared his land physically but titles had not been processed. She said that her and her 2 sisters were not given any shares of land by the deceased.
Margaret Nyoroka also testified and said the dispute in the estate is over a portion of land that the deceased left for himself and his wife. She said that prior to Tabithas death she was staying on deceased persons land with her mother. She said that the 2 acres that the deceased left is used by Macharia the son of the petitioner. She said the widow to the deceased didn’t allow Macharia to put up a house on LR 3559. She said Tabitha was staying at the deceased land where she brought up Stella Kirumba. She said that John Mutuma son to the late Tabitha Muthoni was given land as a gift by the deceased at the time he was also giving his sons land but not on behalf of his mother. She said she didn’t denounce her right to the estate. Margaret Nyoroka said she was the eldest child to the deceased. Stella Kirumba testified and adopted her statements and affidavit in protested. She reiterated what Jane Kiruka and Margaret Nyoroka said in their evidence in chief.
The petitioners case was scheduled to be heard on 28th January 2019 but on due date, neither the petitioner nor counsel were present. The claim by the protesters is therefore not challenged. This court finds that since the sons of the deceased benefitted inter vivos, LR No. Abothuguchi /Katheri/3559 should be distributed equally amongst the daughters of the deceased or their survivors. The son of the petitioner Simon Macharia constructed his house on LR 3559 after the death of the deceased and the death of the widow of the deceased before the court distributed the estate. He acted without authority and should therefore vacate the suitland.
Simon Macharia should inherit through his father the petitioner herein. The costs of application for confirmation and distribution shall be borne by each beneficiary
…………………………
HON. A.ONG’INJO
JUDGE
RULING SIGNED, DELIVERED AND DATED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019.
In the presence of:
CA:- Kinoti
Petitioner:- Mr Muthomi Advocate for Petitioner
Petitioner – Present in person
Protestors:- M/s Basilio Gitonga for Protesters – N/A
…………………………..
HON. A.ONG’INJO
JUDGE
Mr Muthomi
I pray to be supplied with a copy of the ruling and proceedings. We seek 45 days stay so that my client’s son can vacate.
Order
Certified copy of proceedings and ruling to be supplied upon paying copy of charges.
Simon Macharia given 30 days stay of execution to vacate Suitland.
…………………………..
HON. A.ONG’INJO
JUDGE