[2024] KEHC 1140 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 1140 (KLR)

The court held that the application to substitute the name of the deceased beneficiary with that of the applicant was untenable, as the orders sought related to the estate of Francis Mbaabu M’Nkanata and not the original deceased, M’Nkanata M’Raria. The court clarified that the share allocated to Francis Mbaabu...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 1140 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Faith Karimi; Respondent: M’Ikiara M’Raria
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 717 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
Application for substitution disallowed; rectification of grant allowed only to vest share in the estate of the deceased beneficiary.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Succession Procedure, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Succession Procedure Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faith Karimi

Applicant

M’Ikiara M’Raria

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant can be rectified to substitute the name of a deceased beneficiary with that of the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the Probate Court can administer the estate of a beneficiary who died before transmission of the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the application to substitute the name of the deceased beneficiary with that of the applicant was untenable, as the orders sought related to the estate of Francis Mbaabu M’Nkanata and not the original deceased, M’Nkanata M’Raria. The court clarified that the share allocated to Francis Mbaabu M’Nkanata in the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant should vest in his estate, not directly in the applicant. The rectification was allowed only to the extent of reflecting this vesting, and the administrator was directed to distribute the estate accordingly. The court emphasized the administrator's duty to comply with the Law of Succession Act and warned of possible revocation...

Court Disposition

Application for substitution disallowed; rectification of grant allowed only to vest share in the estate of the deceased beneficiary.

Orders

  • The Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 10th April, 2013 shall be rectified to the extent that the share in favour of Francis Mbaabu M’Nkanata shall vest in his estate.
  • A rectified certificate of confirmation of grant shall issue accordingly.