[2019] KEHC 9312 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 9312 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner failed to explain how she became registered as owner of Kiamuri 'A'/1260 after the deceased's death, leading to the conclusion that the transfer was fraudulent. The property was ordered to revert to the estate for distribution. The court applied section 40 of the Law of Succession...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 9312 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Harriet Ntibuka Nkanata; Respondent: Ayub Gituma Nkanata; Respondent: Abraham Murugu Nkanata; Respondent: Margaret Gaiti Nkanata
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 8 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Grant revoked; estate distributed among beneficiaries as per court orders; no order as to costs.
Judges
A Mabeya
Legal Topics
Succession, Estate Distribution, Polygamous Estates, Revocation of Grant, Fraudulent Transfer, Beneficiary Entitlement
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Estate Distribution Polygamous Estates Revocation of Grant Fraudulent Transfer Beneficiary Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harriet Ntibuka Nkanata

Applicant

Ayub Gituma Nkanata

Respondent

Abraham Murugu Nkanata

Respondent

Margaret Gaiti Nkanata

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner concealed material facts in the petition for grant of letters of administration.
  2. 2 Whether the property Kiamuri 'A'/1260 was fraudulently transferred to the petitioner and should revert to the estate.
  3. 3 How the estate of the deceased should be distributed among the beneficiaries in accordance with the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner failed to explain how she became registered as owner of Kiamuri 'A'/1260 after the deceased's death, leading to the conclusion that the transfer was fraudulent. The property was ordered to revert to the estate for distribution. The court applied section 40 of the Law of Succession Act, recognizing the polygamous nature of the deceased's family and the separate settlement of the two houses. The estate was distributed equally among the beneficiaries, with each child and widow constituting a unit. The court considered the parties' proposals and the need to respect the deceased's intention to keep the houses separate. The distribution was made in accordance...

Court Disposition

Grant revoked; estate distributed among beneficiaries as per court orders; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Property known as Kaimura 'A' 1260 is reverted back to the name of the deceased.
  • Abothuguchi/Katheri/306 distributed among Margaret Gaiti Nkanata, Lucy Mwendwa Nkanata, Jane Kagwira Nkamata, Judith Karimi Nkanata, Abrahan Murugu Nkanata, Charity Karega Nkanata, and Rose Nkirote & Brian Ngugi in specified acreages.