[2023] KEHC 19877 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 19877 (KLR)

The court determined that, given the history and complexity of the matter, affidavit evidence would not suffice for a just resolution. Therefore, the matter should proceed by way of oral evidence to allow for a thorough examination of the issues. The objector is to be treated as the plaintiff and the respondent as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 19877 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Objector; Defendant: Respondent
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 355 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Directions
Outcome
Directions issued for hearing by oral evidence.
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Oral Evidence, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Proceedings Oral Evidence Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Objector

Plaintiff

Respondent

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Directions

  1. 1 Whether the matter should proceed by way of oral evidence or affidavit evidence.
  2. 2 Whether the issues raised are sufficiently intricate to warrant oral testimony.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, given the history and complexity of the matter, affidavit evidence would not suffice for a just resolution. Therefore, the matter should proceed by way of oral evidence to allow for a thorough examination of the issues. The objector is to be treated as the plaintiff and the respondent as the defendant, with both parties granted leave to file and exchange statements or any other evidence within 30 days.

Court Disposition

Directions issued for hearing by oral evidence.

Orders

  • The matter shall be heard by way of oral evidence.
  • The objector shall be the plaintiff and the respondent the defendant.