[2011] KEHC 1724 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 1724 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated that they would suffer substantial loss if the stay of execution was not granted, as they were likely to be evicted from the suit land before the determination of their intended appeal. The court was satisfied that this constituted sufficient cause for the grant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] KEHC 1724 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ngunjiri Wambugu; Applicant: Munene Wambugu; Applicant: Francis Kibue Wambugu; Respondent: Miriam Wanjiku Kinyua
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 53 of 2007
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application for stay of execution granted
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Probate and Administration, Substantial Loss, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Stay of Execution Probate and Administration Substantial Loss Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ngunjiri Wambugu

Applicant

Munene Wambugu

Applicant

Francis Kibue Wambugu

Applicant

Miriam Wanjiku Kinyua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an order of stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated substantial loss if the stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether there was inordinate delay in filing the application for stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated that they would suffer substantial loss if the stay of execution was not granted, as they were likely to be evicted from the suit land before the determination of their intended appeal. The court was satisfied that this constituted sufficient cause for the grant of a stay of execution. The court also considered the submissions regarding delay but was persuaded that the interests of justice required the preservation of the status quo pending appeal. Accordingly, the court granted the order for stay of execution as sought in prayer 2(ii) of the summons general dated 14th February 2011, with costs to abide the outcome of the intended appeal.

Court Disposition

application for stay of execution granted

Orders

  • Order of stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 7th May 2010 granted pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
  • Costs shall abide the outcome of the intended appeal.