[2010] KEHC 1856 (KLR)
The court found that there were two conflicting certificates of confirmation of grant regarding the distribution of parcel Ntima/Igoki/5588—one allocating it to Mary Mukongari and another to Pilsila Mpenda Mugo. This inconsistency, coupled with allegations of lack of transparency and threats of eviction by Pilsila,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 1856 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Pilsila Mpenda Mugo; Respondent: Ruth Mukomunene M’Rukaria
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 119 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant and Rectification of Land Register
- Outcome
- Application allowed; registration of parcel Ntima/Igoki/5588 in Pilsila's name canceled and reverted to deceased; inhibition order issued; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Rectification of Land Register, Distribution of Estate, Inhibition Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pilsila Mpenda Mugo
Applicant
Ruth Mukomunene M’Rukaria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant and Rectification of Land Register
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to Pilsila Mpenda Mugo should be revoked, set aside, or annulled.
- 2 Whether the registration of parcel Ntima/Igoki/5588 in the name of Pilsila Mpenda Mugo should be canceled and reverted to the deceased's name.
- 3 Whether inhibition orders should be issued to prevent dealings with parcel Ntima/Igoki/5588 pending determination of the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were two conflicting certificates of confirmation of grant regarding the distribution of parcel Ntima/Igoki/5588—one allocating it to Mary Mukongari and another to Pilsila Mpenda Mugo. This inconsistency, coupled with allegations of lack of transparency and threats of eviction by Pilsila, justified intervention. The court held that the existence of conflicting grants undermined the integrity of the administration process and warranted rectification to protect the interests of all beneficiaries. Accordingly, the court ordered the cancellation of the registration of parcel 5588 in Pilsila's name, reverting it to the deceased's name, and issued an inhibition to...
Court Disposition
Application allowed; registration of parcel Ntima/Igoki/5588 in Pilsila's name canceled and reverted to deceased; inhibition order issued; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Rectification of registration of parcel Ntima/Igoki/5588 by canceling registration in the name of Pilsila Mpenda Mugo and reverting it to M’Rukaria M’Imanyara (deceased).
- Inhibition order registered against parcel Ntima/Igoki/5588 until further orders of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
Succession Cause 119 of 1997
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF M’RUKARIA M’IMANYARA (DECEASED)
PILSILA MPENDA MUGO ................................... PETITIONER
VERSUS
RUTH MUKOMUNENE M’RUKARIA .................. OBJECTOR
RULING
A grant in this matter was first issued to Pilsila Mpenda Mugo and Grace Makandi Rukaria.On the death of Grace, a grant was issued to Pilsila.The deceased estate consisted of three parcels of land namely Ntima/Igoki/5591, 5588and5599. There is an application dated 19th March 2010 which this ruling relates to.The application seeks the following orders:-
1. That the orders of letters (sic) of administration issued to one Pilsila Mpenda be revoked or set aside or annulled.
2. That the new entries made in the register in respect of Ntima/Igoki/5588 be canceled and the same to revert into the name of M’Rukaria M’Imanyara deceased until proper distribution is made.
3. And/or in the alternative the court do issue inhibition orders preventing any dealings in respect of Ntima/Igoki/5588 until this application and this case is heard and determined.
The affidavit sworn by Ruth Mukomunene, who is a sister of Pilsila, stated that parcel number 5588 was supposed to go to her sister Mary Mukongai.When the application was first argued before me in the absence of Pilsila who did not attend, I ordered the applicant Ruth to carry out an official search over parcel number 5588 and to present the search before court before any orders were made.The reason why that order was made was to enable the court to know who was the registered owner least that the court would give orders without giving an opportunity to such a party who is registered to be heard. Ruth swore a further affidavit on 10th June 2010. It is in that affidavit that Ruth elucidated on the matter before court. She stated that she and her siblings Mary Mukongari and Francis Kameme were residing on parcel number 5588. She attached an official search of that parcel of land which showed that it is now registered in the name of Pilsila.In the previous affidavit in support of the application which was sworn on 14th March 2010, there is annexed thereon a certificate of confirmation of grant issued by this court on 15th July 2002. According to that confirmed grant, parcel number 5588 was distributed to Mary Mukongari Ncebere.There is yet another confirmed grant in this same file again showing that it was issued on 15th July 2010 where the same parcel of land number 5588 is distributed to Pilsila Mpenda Mugo.The applicant, Ruth, alleged that Pilsila had been carrying out administration of this estate without being transparent and that she had threatened to evict those who are residing on parcel number 5588. The fact that there is in existence two conflicting confirmed grant does lead credence to that allegation.I will therefore grant the prayers that are sought and I do grant the following orders:
1. An order is hereby made to rectify the registration of parcel number Ntima/Igoki/5588 by canceling the registration of Pilsila Mpenda Mugo and ordering that the parcel of land do revert to the name of M’Rukaria M’Imanyara deceased.
2. An order of inhibition is hereby issued to be registered against parcel number Ntima/Igoki/5588 until further orders of this court.
3. There shall be no orders as to costs.
4. At the reading of this reading, a date will be given for parties to address the court on the distribution of parcels No. Ntima/Igoki/5588 by way of affidavit evidence.
Dated and delivered at Meru this 2nd day of July 2010.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE