[2022] KEHC 16659 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16659 (KLR)

The court held that the scope of rectification under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules is limited to minor errors such as those in names, descriptions, or the time and place of death. The applicants sought to correct errors concerning the description of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16659 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joel Kithinji M’Inoti; Applicant: Francis Gikundi M’Inoti
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
Application for rectification of grant allowed.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Errors in Names and Descriptions, Probate and Administration, Law of Succession Act, Minor Errors in Grants
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Errors in Names and Descriptions Probate and Administration Law of Succession Act Minor Errors in Grants

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joel Kithinji M’Inoti

Applicant

Francis Gikundi M’Inoti

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the errors in the description of some assets in the grant can be rectified under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the scope of rectification under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules is limited to minor errors such as those in names, descriptions, or the time and place of death. The applicants sought to correct errors concerning the description of some assets, which the court found to be minor and within the permissible scope for rectification. The application was therefore merited and allowed, as the errors fell squarely within the statutory provisions governing rectification of grants.

Court Disposition

Application for rectification of grant allowed.

Orders

  • Errors concerning the description of some assets in the grant are rectified as prayed.