[2021] KEHC 3222 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 3222 (KLR)

The court found that the objections raised by the respondent were unsubstantiated and lacked legal merit, as no specific defects or legal grounds were articulated. The only procedural defect identified was the use of an originating summons instead of a summons application, but this was cured by Article 159 of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 3222 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Teresia Wanjiru Kimani; Respondent: James Ngige Warobo; Respondent: David Mbeke Kanyoro; Respondent: Grace Njeri Kanyoro
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 59 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Rectify Grant and Substitute Administrator
Outcome
application allowed in part; objections dismissed; directions given for further reports; no order as to costs
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Succession, Rectification of Grant, Administrator Substitution, Estate Distribution
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Rectification of Grant Administrator Substitution Estate Distribution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teresia Wanjiru Kimani

Applicant

James Ngige Warobo

Respondent

David Mbeke Kanyoro

Respondent

Grace Njeri Kanyoro

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Rectify Grant and Substitute Administrator

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate should be rectified to substitute the deceased administrator with the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the confirmed grant should be rectified to pass the share of the deceased administrator to another beneficiary.
  3. 3 Whether procedural defects in the form of the application are fatal to the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the objections raised by the respondent were unsubstantiated and lacked legal merit, as no specific defects or legal grounds were articulated. The only procedural defect identified was the use of an originating summons instead of a summons application, but this was cured by Article 159 of the Constitution, which mandates that justice be administered without undue regard to procedural technicalities. The court held that since no title had passed to the deceased administrator, substitution was proper, and the share could be reallocated as sought. The application to rectify the grant and substitute the administrator was therefore merited and allowed. The court also...

Court Disposition

application allowed in part; objections dismissed; directions given for further reports; no order as to costs

Orders

  • The grant re-amended on 5th March, 2018 is further rectified by substituting the name of Lilian Waithera Kimani (deceased) with Teresia Wanjiru Kimani.
  • The confirmed grant is further rectified to reflect that the share of Jane Nduta Munyua (deceased) shall be shared equally by Teresia Wanjiru Kimani and Esther Njoki Murigi.