[2024] KEHC 539 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 539 (KLR)

The court found that the proposed mode of distribution had the consent of all beneficiaries except one, Cyrus Ndungu Kahura, who did not provide a substantive alternative or demonstrate that the distribution was inequitable or unlawful. The court held that the distribution captured all the deceased's properties and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 539 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Elizabeth Njeri Njenga; Applicant: Mary Wambui Kabucho; Applicant: Cyrus Ndungu Kahura; Respondent: All other beneficiaries (children and widows of the deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 3149 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Grant confirmed and estate distributed as proposed.
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Succession, Distribution of Estate, Consent of Beneficiaries, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Distribution of Estate Consent of Beneficiaries Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Njeri Njenga

Applicant

Mary Wambui Kabucho

Applicant

Cyrus Ndungu Kahura

Applicant

All other beneficiaries (children and widows of the deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate is equitable and in accordance with the law.
  2. 2 Whether the objection by one co-administrator (Cyrus Ndungu Kahura) invalidates the consent of the other beneficiaries.
  3. 3 Whether the grant as rectified should be confirmed as per the proposed distribution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the proposed mode of distribution had the consent of all beneficiaries except one, Cyrus Ndungu Kahura, who did not provide a substantive alternative or demonstrate that the distribution was inequitable or unlawful. The court held that the distribution captured all the deceased's properties and was equitable among all beneficiaries. The objection of a single beneficiary, in the absence of evidence of unfairness or illegality, does not override the collective consent and the requirements of the Law of Succession Act. The grant as rectified was therefore confirmed, and the estate ordered to be distributed as proposed.

Court Disposition

Grant confirmed and estate distributed as proposed.

Orders

  • The grant issued and rectified on 2.2.2022 is confirmed.
  • The estate of Murimi Gichuhi is to be distributed among the beneficiaries as set out in the proposed mode of distribution.