[2024] KEHC 15431 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 15431 (KLR)

The court found that the reference challenging the taxed costs of Kshs. 40,129,466 remains pending and that the main succession cause has not been concluded. Given the substantial amount involved and the fact that the estate, rather than any individual, is affected, the court held that it is just to grant a stay of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 15431 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alice Wanjiku Mwangi; Applicant: Mary Waithera Kimanga; Applicant: Jane Wamaitha Kimanga; Respondent: Priscah Wanjiku Kimanga; Respondent: Stephen Maina Kimanga; Interested Party: Gerald Irungu & Alice Wanjiru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1728 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Stay of Execution and Directions on Reference
Outcome
Applications for stay of execution and directions on reference allowed.
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Estate Administration, Taxation of Costs, Stay of Execution, Reference Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Estate Administration Taxation of Costs Stay of Execution Reference Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alice Wanjiku Mwangi

Applicant

Mary Waithera Kimanga

Applicant

Jane Wamaitha Kimanga

Applicant

Priscah Wanjiku Kimanga

Respondent

Stephen Maina Kimanga

Respondent

Gerald Irungu & Alice Wanjiru

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Stay of Execution and Directions on Reference

  1. 1 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending determination of the reference against the taxed costs.
  2. 2 Whether the outcome of the reference should await the determination of Succession Cause No. E1445 of 2020.
  3. 3 Whether any party will suffer prejudice if stay is granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the reference challenging the taxed costs of Kshs. 40,129,466 remains pending and that the main succession cause has not been concluded. Given the substantial amount involved and the fact that the estate, rather than any individual, is affected, the court held that it is just to grant a stay of execution pending the determination of the reference. The court reasoned that no party would suffer prejudice from such a stay, as the main cause is yet to be heard and determined. Furthermore, the outcome of the reference should await the determination of Succession Cause No. E1445 of 2020, as it will impact the administration and liabilities of the estate. The applications...

Court Disposition

Applications for stay of execution and directions on reference allowed.

Orders

  • The pending reference herein shall be determined forthwith.
  • Pending the hearing and determination of the reference, there shall be a stay of execution against the applicants and/or the estate.