[2022] KEHC 16241 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16241 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants' claim was based on a sale agreement for land parcel Mwitumwiru/943, whereas the property they sought to have distributed to them was land parcel Ntima/igoki/943. Since the subject matter of the sale agreement was not the same as the property sought, the court held that it could...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16241 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Micheck Maingi Muthuri; Applicant: Cyprian Iburi Ngaruro; Applicant: Lawrence Kiriinya Iburi; Respondent: Tabitha Itwaruchiu; Respondent: Nkirote Mugambi; Respondent: Martin Mugambi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause E021 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Distribution of Estate
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Succession, Distribution of Estate, Sale Agreement Disputes
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Distribution of Estate Sale Agreement Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Micheck Maingi Muthuri

Applicant

Cyprian Iburi Ngaruro

Applicant

Lawrence Kiriinya Iburi

Applicant

Tabitha Itwaruchiu

Respondent

Nkirote Mugambi

Respondent

Martin Mugambi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Distribution of Estate

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to distribution of the deceased's share in land parcel Ntima/igoki/943 based on a sale agreement for a different parcel.
  2. 2 Whether the court can order distribution of land not subject to the sale agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants' claim was based on a sale agreement for land parcel Mwitumwiru/943, whereas the property they sought to have distributed to them was land parcel Ntima/igoki/943. Since the subject matter of the sale agreement was not the same as the property sought, the court held that it could not order distribution of Ntima/igoki/943 to the applicants. The application was therefore disallowed, and the applicants were ordered to bear their own costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Summons dated May 9, 2022 is disallowed.
  • Applicants shall bear their own costs.