[2015] KEHC 2093 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2093 (KLR)

The court found that the administrator, Daniel Njuguna Kinuthia, had concealed material facts by failing to disclose the existence of members of the first house of the deceased and only disclosing members of the second house. The administrator did not contest the application for revocation, and his advocates...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 2093 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Kori Kinuthia; Respondent: Daniel Njuguna Kinuthia
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1602 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Application for revocation of grant allowed; grant revoked; new administrators appointed; costs awarded to applicant.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Concealment of Material Facts, Administration of Estates
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Concealment of Material Facts Administration of Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Kori Kinuthia

Applicant

Daniel Njuguna Kinuthia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration intestate was obtained by concealment of material facts.
  2. 2 Whether the administrator misrepresented facts to the court.
  3. 3 Whether the grant should be revoked under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the administrator, Daniel Njuguna Kinuthia, had concealed material facts by failing to disclose the existence of members of the first house of the deceased and only disclosing members of the second house. The administrator did not contest the application for revocation, and his advocates confirmed they had no instructions to oppose it. The court held that this conduct amounted to misrepresentation and fraud, bringing the matter within the scope of Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. Consequently, the court was satisfied that a case had been made for revocation of the grant, and proceeded to revoke the grant, set aside the confirmation orders, cancel the...

Court Disposition

Application for revocation of grant allowed; grant revoked; new administrators appointed; costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

  • The grant made on 11th November 2011 to Daniel Njuguna Kinuthia is hereby revoked.
  • The orders made on 29th November 2011 confirming the said grant are hereby set aside.