[2019] KEHC 2782 (KLR)
The court declined to grant the prayers sought by the applicant due to lack of evidence that the respondent was served with or was aware of the court order allegedly disobeyed. The record did not show that the respondent or her counsel were present when the order was issued, and there was no indication of proper...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 2782 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Margaret Wanjiku Mwaura; Respondent: __MISSING__
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 3116 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Contempt and Injunctive Relief Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed due to lack of service of the relevant court order.
- Judges
- A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Succession Estate Management, Contempt of Court, Injunctive Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Wanjiku Mwaura
Applicant
__MISSING__
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Contempt and Injunctive Relief Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent disobeyed court orders issued on 9th July 2017 regarding the management of the deceased's estate.
- 2 Whether the respondent should be committed to civil jail for contempt of court.
- 3 Whether injunctive orders restraining construction and waste on the suit property should be granted pending determination of the main suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to grant the prayers sought by the applicant due to lack of evidence that the respondent was served with or was aware of the court order allegedly disobeyed. The record did not show that the respondent or her counsel were present when the order was issued, and there was no indication of proper service. The court emphasized that for an order to be enforceable, especially in contempt proceedings, the alleged contemnor must have knowledge of the order. The applicant's failure to serve the order and apparent lack of diligence in prosecuting the matter further undermined the application. Consequently, the court ordered that the relevant order be extracted and served upon the...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed due to lack of service of the relevant court order.
Orders
- The order of 9th July 2017 to be extracted and served upon counsel for the respondent and the respondent personally forthwith.
- The application for revocation of grant filed on 21st November 2014 to be set down for hearing within the next 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI
(FAMILY DIVISION)
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO 3116 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NG’ANG’A NJUGUNA (DECEASED)
MARGARET WANJIKU MWAURA ..............................APPLICANT
R U L I N G
1. The application before court is dated 2nd August, 2019. Despite service the Respondent did not file any response to the same.
2. The said application seeks for the following prayers:
i) That the court do issue a notice to the Petitioner/Respondent to show cause why she should not be committed to civil jail for disobeying the orders of this curt given on 9th July, 2017 and issued on 16th October 2017 requiring her to hold the subject suit properties in trust for all the beneficiaries till the matter is heard and determined.
ii) That the hearing and determination of this application and all the other applications in this matter the Petitioner/Respondent be and is hereby restrained from continuing to construct and/or commencing any subject suit property and in particular the property known as Dagoretti/Riruta/296.
iii) That pending the hearing and determination of the main suit the Petitioner/Respondent be and is hereby restrained from continuing to construct and/or commencing any further construction of any form of building, permanent or otherwise on the subject suit property and in particular the Dagoretti/Riruta/296.
iv) That pending the hearing and determination of this application and all the other applications in this matter the Petitioner/Respondent be and is hereby restrained from cutting down any trees on any of the properties which are the subject in this suit and in particular the property known as Dagoretti/Riruta/296.
3. The application is based on grounds that the Respondent despite being aware of the court order made on 9th July 2017 she has defied the said order and is wasting the estate to the detriment of the other beneficiaries as she has commenced construction of permanent structures on the suit premises.
4. From the court record when the court issued the order subject matter of this application on the 19th of July 2017 only Mrs. Mwaura for the applicants was present in court.
The court on asking whether the said order was served the response in the court was that both the Respondent and counsel were present which is contrary to what is reflected on the court, record.
5. The courts do not give orders in vain. Secondly if an order is to be obeyed it has to be known. There is no indication that the applicant is aware of the order she is alleged to have defied.
Thirdly it appears that upon receipt of the order the Applicants went to slumber. They did not only fail to serve but appears to have lost interest in the matter.
6. Against the above background and due to lack of service of the said order I decline to grant the prayers sought and I direct that:
i. The said order be extracted and served upon counsel for the Respondent and the Respondent personally forthwith.
ii. Secondly I direct that the application for revocation of grant filed on 21st November, 2014 be set down for hearing within the next 30 days.
iii. Costs in the cause.
Dated and Delivered in Nairobi on this 24TH day of OCTOBER, 2019.
…………………………………….
ALI-ARONI
JUDGE