[2008] KEHC 149 (KLR)
The court found that the order made on 22nd February 2008 was a court order, not a consent order, and thus could be revisited. The applicant provided a credible explanation, supported by affidavit evidence from his advocate, that there was a misunderstanding regarding his instructions on the distribution of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 149 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Benson Nguyo Ngatia; Respondent: Ruth Wanjiku Nyatoro; Respondent: Joseph Ngatia Nderitu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause 542 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Cancel Confirmed Grant
- Outcome
- Application allowed; confirmed grant cancelled; redistribution of estate ordered.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Revocation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benson Nguyo Ngatia
Applicant
Ruth Wanjiku Nyatoro
Respondent
Joseph Ngatia Nderitu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Cancel Confirmed Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the confirmed grant issued on 22nd February 2008 should be cancelled due to alleged misunderstanding of instructions by the applicant's counsel.
- 2 Whether the distribution of the estate property TETU/IHURURU/126 should be revisited and reallocated.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the order made on 22nd February 2008 was a court order, not a consent order, and thus could be revisited. The applicant provided a credible explanation, supported by affidavit evidence from his advocate, that there was a misunderstanding regarding his instructions on the distribution of the estate property. Given the applicant's relationship to the deceased and the lack of clarity regarding the relationship of one of the protestors, the court determined that the interests of justice required the cancellation of the confirmed grant and a redistribution of the property in accordance with the applicant's clarified instructions. The court thus exercised its discretion to...
Court Disposition
Application allowed; confirmed grant cancelled; redistribution of estate ordered.
Orders
- The confirmed grant issued by this court on 22nd February 2008 is hereby cancelled.
- L.R. TETU/IHURURU/126 shall be divided into two equal shares: one share to Benson Nguyo Ngatia absolutely, the other half to be shared equally between Joseph Ngatia Nderitu and Ruth Wanjiku Nyatoro.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
SUCCESSION CAUSE 542 OF 2004
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NGATIA NGURIBU
ALIAS NGATIA S/O NGURIBU….............................................…. DCD
AND
BENSON NGUYO NGATIA...…….……………………...PETITIONER
RULING
When this matter came up for confirmation of grant on 22nd February 2008 the court recorded an order that the suit property TETU/IHURURU/126 be shared equally between the petitioner and the protestors namely; Joseph Ngatia Nderitu and Ruth Wanjiku Nyatoro. That order was recorded after the petitioner conceded that the other property mentioned in the application for confirmation did not belong to the estate. The petitioner has now brought an application dated 9th April 2008. In that application the petitioner seeks for the cancellation of the grant issued on 22nd February 2008. The ground upon which he seeks that prayer is that his counsel misunderstood his instructions to the effect that property TETU/IHURURU/126 was to be shared with him getting half of it and the other half to go to the two protestors equally. He said that those were instructions that he gave to Samuel Ndungu Mukunya advocate when he appeared in his chambers. On 22nd February 2008 Mr. Gori Advocate appeared in court from that firm and due to the misunderstanding failed to represent his correct instructions. Learned counsel Mr. Gori also swore and affidavit confirming the same. The application was opposed by Ruth Wanjiku Nyatoro on the basis that it was an after thought because the applicant petitioner was in court when the grant was confirmed. I have considered the application and the opposition raised by Nyatoro. From the outset I would state that the order made on 22nd February 2008 was not a consent order but rather was a court order. That being the case this court can revisit that order. In perusing the various documents in this file I find that the petitioner was the son of the deceased. Although it is not very clear what relationship Nyatoro had to the deceased. The other protestor Nderitu is said to have been a grandson of the deceased. That being the case I find that the orders sought by the petitioner are merited in view of the explanation given by him and in view of his relationship to the deceased. The orders of this court are as follows:-
1. That the confirmed grant issued by this court on 22nd February 2008 is hereby cancelled.
2. That L.R. TETU/IHURURU/126 be divided into two equal shares with one such share being given to Benson Nguyo Ngatia absolutely and the other half to be shared equally between Joseph Ngatia Nderitu and Ruth Wanjiku Nyatoro.
3. There shall be no orders as to costs in respect of the summons dated 9th April 2008.
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 16th day of October 2008.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE