[2024] KEHC 7736 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 7736 (KLR)

The court found that the objectors provided satisfactory explanations for their delay in filing objections, including lack of notice of the petition and personal circumstances such as illness and exclusion from the process. The court exercised its discretion to allow the applications for extension of time, holding...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 7736 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kairu Ngure; Applicant: Anne Messi Kairu; Applicant: Maguku Ngure Kairu; Applicant: Njambi Ngure Kairi; Applicant: Wangui Wambui Ngure; Respondent: Eliza Muringo Ngure; Respondent: Kelvin Gatimu Muhinyia Ngure; Respondent: Kennedy Kihuha Muhinya Ngure
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause E2190 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Extension of Time to File Objections to Grant of Letters of Administration
Outcome
Applications for extension of time allowed; objections deemed properly filed; directions for service and response issued; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
MA Odero
Legal Topics
Succession, Grant of Letters of Administration, Extension of Time, Objection to Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Grant of Letters of Administration Extension of Time Objection to Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kairu Ngure

Applicant

Anne Messi Kairu

Applicant

Maguku Ngure Kairu

Applicant

Njambi Ngure Kairi

Applicant

Wangui Wambui Ngure

Applicant

Eliza Muringo Ngure

Respondent

Kelvin Gatimu Muhinyia Ngure

Respondent

Kennedy Kihuha Muhinya Ngure

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Extension of Time to File Objections to Grant of Letters of Administration

  1. 1 Whether the objectors should be granted an extension of time to file objections to the issuance of a grant of letters of administration intestate.
  2. 2 Whether the objections already filed out of time should be deemed properly filed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the objectors provided satisfactory explanations for their delay in filing objections, including lack of notice of the petition and personal circumstances such as illness and exclusion from the process. The court exercised its discretion to allow the applications for extension of time, holding that no undue prejudice would be suffered by the petitioners, and that the objectors should be given an opportunity to pursue their rights as potential beneficiaries. The objections already filed were deemed properly filed, and directions were given for service and response timelines.

Court Disposition

Applications for extension of time allowed; objections deemed properly filed; directions for service and response issued; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The applications dated 18th February, 2022 and 11th May, 2022 are allowed.
  • The three objectors are granted an extension of time to object to the petition for grant of letters of administration intestate.