[2018] KEHC 2754 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent had obtained the grant through fraudulent means, including the concealment of material facts and the making of false statements, as evidenced by his conviction for forgery and obtaining registration by false pretences. The respondent's failure to involve all beneficiaries and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2754 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Erastus Kea Njiema; Applicant: Henry Gitonga Njiema; Applicant: Aniseta Kaburu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause Cause17 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- grant revoked; new administrators appointed
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Fraud in Succession, Administrator Appointment, Concealment of Material Facts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erastus Kea Njiema
Respondent
Henry Gitonga Njiema
Applicant
Aniseta Kaburu
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to the respondent should be revoked due to fraud, concealment of material facts, and procedural defects.
- 2 Whether the respondent is fit to continue as administrator of the estate after conviction for fraud.
- 3 Who should be appointed as administrators of the deceased's estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had obtained the grant through fraudulent means, including the concealment of material facts and the making of false statements, as evidenced by his conviction for forgery and obtaining registration by false pretences. The respondent's failure to involve all beneficiaries and the inclusion of strangers in the distribution further demonstrated procedural defects. The court held that these grounds satisfied the requirements under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act for revocation of the grant. Consequently, the grant issued to the respondent was revoked and nullified, all subdivisions of the estate reversed, and the properties ordered to revert to the...
Court Disposition
grant revoked; new administrators appointed
Orders
- The grant issued on 19th March 2012 and confirmed on 2nd April 2013 is revoked and nullified.
- All subdivisions of properties forming the estate resulting from the certificate of confirmation are reversed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT CHUKA
MISC. SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 17 OF 2018
(FORMERLY SPM CHUKA SUCC. CAUSE NO. 14 OF 2012)
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NJIEMA MUTHIRWA ALIAS NJIEMA MITHIRUA (DECEASED)
AND
ERASTUS KEA NJIEMA..................................PETITIONER
- VERSUS -
HENRY GITONGA NJIEMA......................1ST.APPLICANT
ANISETA KABURU.....................................2ND APPLICANT
R U L I N G
1. HENRY GITONGA NJIEMA & ANISETA KABURU have through Summons for Revocation of Grant dated 5th July 2018 sought for the revocation of grant issued to Erastus Kea Njiema, the petitioner herein on 2nd April, 2013 on the following grounds namely:-
(a) That the proceedings to obtain the grant were defective in substance.
(b) That the grant was obtained fraudulently and through false statement.
(c) That the grant was obtained by the concealment from the court, ofmaterial facts to the cause.
(d) That the grant was obtained by untrue allegation of fact.
(e) That the petitioner/respondent left out some children of the deceased during distribution of the estate and included strangers.
2. The applicants have in support of this application filed an affidavit sworn by the 1st applicant on 5th July, 2018 stated that the respondent did not involve them and only surprised them when he took the surveyors to the estate accompanied by police officers wanting to subdivide the estate. He has also deposed that the respondent forged documents which led to his arraignment in court where he was charged vide Chuka Chief Magistrate's CourtCriminal Case No. 419/2016 and found guilty of forgery of a judiciary document contrary to Section 351 of the Penal Code and obtaining registration by false pretences contrary to Section 320 of the Penal Code.
3. The respondent at the hearing of this application conceded that he was indeed charged and convicted of the said counts. He also stated that he did not appeal which clearly shows that he is guilty of fraud and concealment from court of material facts when he obtained the grant in the cause of the lower court vide Chuka Chief Magistrate's Court Succession Cause No. 14 of 2012.
This court finds that applicants have established sufficient grounds for this court under Section 76 of Law of Succession Act to revoke which I hereby do the grant issued on 19th March 2012 and confirmed on 2nd April, 2013. The grant is hereby nullified and all subdivisions of properties forming the estate resulting from the certificate of confirmation are hereby reversed. The properties comprising the estate namely;
(i) Karingani/Muiru/747and
(ii) Karingani/Muiru/260
shall revert back to the name of deceased pending the determination of cause which I direct to be transferred to this court for purposes of hearing and determination.
I also find that the petitioner having been convicted of fraud is not fit to be appointed the administrator of the estate of the late Njeima Mwithirwa alias Njiema Mwithirua (deceased). This court pursuant to the provisions of Section 66 of the Law of Succession Act hereby appoints Henry Gitonga Njiema and Aniceta Kaburu as the administrator and administratrix respectively of the estate of the late Njiema Muthirwa alias Njiema Mwithirua. The two shall jointly administer the estate by involving all the children of the deceased and I grant them liberty to apply for confirmation of grant before the expiry of statutory period in view of the age of this cause.
Dated, signed and delivered at Chuka this 2nd day of November, 2018.
R.K. LIMO
JUDGE
2/11/2018
Ruling signed, dated and delivered in the presence of both parties and Kaaria for applicant.
R.K. LIMO
JUDGE
2/11/2018