[2018] KEHC 2754 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2754 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had obtained the grant through fraudulent means, including the concealment of material facts and the making of false statements, as evidenced by his conviction for forgery and obtaining registration by false pretences. The respondent's failure to involve all beneficiaries and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2754 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Erastus Kea Njiema; Applicant: Henry Gitonga Njiema; Applicant: Aniseta Kaburu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Succession Cause Cause17 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
grant revoked; new administrators appointed
Judges
BB Limo
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Fraud in Succession, Administrator Appointment, Concealment of Material Facts
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Fraud in Succession Administrator Appointment Concealment of Material Facts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erastus Kea Njiema

Respondent

Henry Gitonga Njiema

Applicant

Aniseta Kaburu

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to the respondent should be revoked due to fraud, concealment of material facts, and procedural defects.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is fit to continue as administrator of the estate after conviction for fraud.
  3. 3 Who should be appointed as administrators of the deceased's estate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had obtained the grant through fraudulent means, including the concealment of material facts and the making of false statements, as evidenced by his conviction for forgery and obtaining registration by false pretences. The respondent's failure to involve all beneficiaries and the inclusion of strangers in the distribution further demonstrated procedural defects. The court held that these grounds satisfied the requirements under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act for revocation of the grant. Consequently, the grant issued to the respondent was revoked and nullified, all subdivisions of the estate reversed, and the properties ordered to revert to the...

Court Disposition

grant revoked; new administrators appointed

Orders

  • The grant issued on 19th March 2012 and confirmed on 2nd April 2013 is revoked and nullified.
  • All subdivisions of properties forming the estate resulting from the certificate of confirmation are reversed.