[2020] KEELC 1333 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 1333 (KLR)

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to determine succession matters, which are reserved for the Succession Court. The applicant admitted that the respondents are the current registered proprietors of the suit land, and under Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, their title is prima facie absolute and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 1333 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jackson Kariuki Gikando (Suing as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Njine Mwara); Respondent: Stephen Ndegwa Mwangi; Respondent: Fridah Gacheri Karimi; Respondent: Irene Wothaya
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Succession Disputes, Injunctions, Land Registration, Proprietorship, Revocation of Grant
Source Language
en
Land and Property Succession Disputes Injunctions Land Registration Proprietorship Revocation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Kariuki Gikando (Suing as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Njine Mwara)

Applicant

Stephen Ndegwa Mwangi

Respondent

Fridah Gacheri Karimi

Respondent

Irene Wothaya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to determine issues relating to succession and administration of estates.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interlocutory injunction orders restraining the respondents from dealing with land parcel NGARIAMA/MERICHI/461.
  3. 3 Whether an injunction can issue in a miscellaneous application where no substantive suit is filed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to determine succession matters, which are reserved for the Succession Court. The applicant admitted that the respondents are the current registered proprietors of the suit land, and under Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act, their title is prima facie absolute and indefeasible unless challenged on grounds of fraud or illegality, which must be established at a full hearing. The court further found that, as this was a miscellaneous application and not a substantive suit, it could not grant an interlocutory injunction. The application failed to meet the threshold for injunctive relief as set out in Giella v Cassman Brown, and the court could...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 9th July 2019 is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • No interlocutory injunction or inhibition order is granted.