[2020] KEHC 6127 (KLR)
The court held that the estate of the late Nyiri Mbogori, specifically LR No.Ntima/Igoki/1354, must be distributed in accordance with the Law of Succession Act and the Constitution of Kenya 2010, as the property is registered and the direct beneficiaries (the deceased's children) are themselves deceased. The Ameru...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 6127 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ginaro Kiogora Ithinji; Applicant: Luka Mutwiri Mugwika; Applicant: Paul M’Amathi M’Ithinji; Respondent: Naomi Nkoroi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 737 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
- Outcome
- Estate distributed according to the Law of Succession Act; certificate of confirmation of grant to issue; each party to bear own costs.
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Customary Law Vs Statute, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ginaro Kiogora Ithinji
Applicant
Luka Mutwiri Mugwika
Applicant
Paul M’Amathi M’Ithinji
Applicant
Naomi Nkoroi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the estate of the late Nyiri Mbogori should be distributed according to Ameru customary law or the Law of Succession Act.
- 2 How the property LR No.Ntima/Igoki/1354 should be apportioned among the beneficiaries.
- 3 Whether the proposal for unequal distribution among the children of the deceased's son is legally justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the estate of the late Nyiri Mbogori, specifically LR No.Ntima/Igoki/1354, must be distributed in accordance with the Law of Succession Act and the Constitution of Kenya 2010, as the property is registered and the direct beneficiaries (the deceased's children) are themselves deceased. The Ameru customary law does not apply in this context, especially since the grandchildren are now the beneficiaries. The proposal to allocate unequal shares among the children of the late M’Amathi M’Ithinji was rejected for lack of legal basis. The court ordered that the property be divided into two equal portions: one half to be shared equally among the children of the late M’Ikiugi...
Court Disposition
Estate distributed according to the Law of Succession Act; certificate of confirmation of grant to issue; each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- LR No.Ntima/Igoki/1354 (1.41 HA) to be divided into two equal portions of 0.705 HA each.
- First 0.705 HA to be shared equally among Peter Kubania M’Mbui, Luca Mutwiri Mugwika, Peter Kiambi N’Ikiugu, Eutycus Mutuma, and Boniface Kinyua Nkubi.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
44 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT KENYA
AT MERU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO 737 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF NYIRI MBOGORI......DECEASED
GINARO KIOGORA ITHINJI...............................................1ST PETITIONER
LUKA MUTWIRI MUGWIKA..............................................2ND PETITIONER
PAUL M’AMATHI M’ITHINJI..............................................3RD PETITIONER
VERSUS
NAOMI NKOROI..............................................................................APPLICANT
RULING
1. The estate of the late Nyiri Mbogori who died on 1st October 1967 is due for distribution following the filing of summons for confirmation dated 9th April 2018 by Genaro Kiogora Ithinji. The Applicant proposed that parcel of land No.Ntima/Igoki/1354 be shared equally between the families of the Late Moses M’Ithinji and the Late M’Ikiugu M’Inyiri who were the only children of the deceased herein.This proposal was confirmed by Luka Mutwiri Mugwika and Paul M’Amathi M’Ithinji save that Paul M’Amathi proposed that the share due to his late father Moses M’Ithinji be distributed into 3 portions where he and his brother Genaro Kiogora would get one portion each and their mother Naomi Nkoroi and the daughters of their father to get the 3rd portion to share equally.
2. The share belonging to the late M’Ikiugi M’Inyiri was then to be shared equally amongst his children namely:
a. Peter Kubania M’Mbui
b. Luca Mutwiri Mugwika
c. Peter Kiambi N’Ikiugu
d. Eutycus Mutuma
e. Boniface Kinyua Nkubi
3. Paul M’Amathi M’Ithinji swore a supplementary affidavit on 26th November 2019 in which he annexed a copy of minutes purported to have been taken and presided over by the Assistant Chief of Lower Igoki Sub-Location where it was decided that the share for the Late M’Ithinji M’Inyiri was to be divided into 3 and the 3rd portion was to be shared between the widow and the daughters of the deceased whereas the 2 sons were to take a portion each. The minutes are not signed by those who are alleged to have attended or even the Assistant Chief who is said to have presided over and taken the minutes. The said Assistant Chief has not sworn an affidavit to confirm the allegations made by Paul M’Amathi. Veronica Ntarara Mutua and Genaro Kiogora opposed the averments in the supplementary affidavits and said there was no meeting held on 5th November 2009 as alleged by Paul M’Amathi . The two proposed equal distribution of the share of the late M’Amathi M’Ithinji .
4. In the 3rd Petitioner’s written submissions in support of his proposal of mode of distribution he urged the court to apply the Ameru customary law in the distribution of the estate of the deceased for reasons that the deceased died in 1967 and the Law of Succession Act came into operation on 1st July 1981. However this proposal is sharply contrasted by the allegations that a meeting was held on 6th November 2009 in which the mode of distribution he proposed was agreed upon.
5. It is not in dispute that the deceased died in 1967 as per the letter dated 16th January 2012, written by Geoffrey Murithi Chief of Igoki Location, but the 3rd Administrator has not explained how the application of the Ameru Customary law comes into play because they are grandchildren of the deceased and their father who was the direct beneficiary is since deceased. The 3rd Administrator Paul M’Amathi has not disclosed when his father M’Amathi M’Ithinji died so that his estate could be administered in accordance with the Ameru customary law. In any case the property LR No.Ntima/Igoki/1354 measuring 1. 41 HA is a registered property which can only be regulated by the Constitution of Kenya 2010 and the written law which is The Law of Succession Act. The 3rd Administrator being one of the children of the Late M’Amathi M’Ithinji does not have a legal basis to claim more shares than his mother and siblings. In the circumstances the estate of the late Nyiri Mbogori shall be distributed as follows:
LR No.Ntima/Igoki/1354-1. 41 HA
a.0. 705 HA to be shared equally amongst
i. Peter Kubania M’Mbui
ii. Luca Mutwiri Mugwika
iii. Peter Kiambi N’Ikiugu
iv. Eutycus Mutuma
v. Boniface Kinyua Nkubi
b. 0. 705 HA to be shared equally amongst
i. Naomi Nkoroe
ii. Paul M’Amathi
iii. Genaro Kiogora Thinji
iv. Veronica Ntarara
v. Derebina Kathure
vi. Hellen Kooru
vii. Lydia Naitore
viii. Janet Nkirote
ix. Harriet Kibobori
6. A certificate of confirmation of grant shall issue to that effect and the cost of the application for confirmation shall be borne by each party.
HON.ANNE ADWERA ONGINJO
JUDGE
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI VIA EMAIL THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2020 DUE TO THE PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVES ISSUED ON 15TH MARCH 2020 AND SUBSEQUENTLY ON 7TH APRIL 2020 DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC.
HON.ANNE ADWERA ONGINJO
JUDGE