[2019] KEHC 9049 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 9049 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, being grandchildren of the deceased, could only participate in the succession proceedings as legal representatives of their respective parents. The applicants failed to provide proof of their appointment as administrators of their parents' estates, and thus lacked the legal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 9049 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Peter Panyako Omusungu; Applicant: Patrick Emoit Barasa; Applicant: Bisansio Etyang’ Ojuma; Applicant: Christopher Omuse Odere
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration 184 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
KW Kiarie
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Succession of Estates, Legal Capacity of Applicants
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Succession of Estates Legal Capacity of Applicants

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Panyako Omusungu

Petitioner

Patrick Emoit Barasa

Applicant

Bisansio Etyang’ Ojuma

Applicant

Christopher Omuse Odere

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have legal capacity to seek revocation of the grant of letters of administration.
  2. 2 Whether the grant was obtained by concealment of material facts or fraudulently by making false statements as to beneficiaries.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants, as grandchildren, have standing to challenge the grant under the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, being grandchildren of the deceased, could only participate in the succession proceedings as legal representatives of their respective parents. The applicants failed to provide proof of their appointment as administrators of their parents' estates, and thus lacked the legal capacity to bring the application for revocation of the grant. Furthermore, the evidence showed that the deceased had already apportioned land to his sons, and the applicants' fathers had not challenged the distribution during their lifetimes. The court held that there was no concealment of material facts or fraudulent statements in the grant application, and the applicants had not...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revocation of grant is dismissed with costs.
  • The petitioner is ordered to apply for confirmation of the grant within 30 days, failing which the grant shall be revoked.