[2021] KEHC 6219 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6219 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent misrepresented himself as a grandson and sole heir of the deceased, a claim that went unchallenged by the respondent despite being served. The applicant's assertion that the respondent was a stranger to the estate was not rebutted. The court applied section 76 of the Law of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 6219 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Thomas Nyakado Abongo; Respondent: Joseph Arum Odila
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration 7 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Probate Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
Application allowed. Grant revoked. Applicant appointed administrator. Land parcels to revert to original title. Respondent to pay costs.
Judges
KW Kiarie
Legal Topics
Revocation of Grant, Intestate Succession, Misrepresentation in Probate, Entitlement to Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Revocation of Grant Intestate Succession Misrepresentation in Probate Entitlement to Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Nyakado Abongo

Applicant

Joseph Arum Odila

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Probate Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the respondent misrepresented himself as a beneficiary of the deceased's estate.
  2. 2 Whether the grant issued to the respondent should be revoked under section 76 of the Law of Succession Act.
  3. 3 Who is entitled to administer and inherit the estate of the deceased under section 39(1) of the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent misrepresented himself as a grandson and sole heir of the deceased, a claim that went unchallenged by the respondent despite being served. The applicant's assertion that the respondent was a stranger to the estate was not rebutted. The court applied section 76 of the Law of Succession Act, which allows for revocation of a grant obtained by fraud or misrepresentation, and section 39(1), which sets out the order of entitlement in intestate succession where there is no surviving spouse or children. The court concluded that the respondent was not entitled to the estate, revoked the grant issued to him, and appointed the applicant as administrator, ordering...

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Grant revoked. Applicant appointed administrator. Land parcels to revert to original title. Respondent to pay costs.

Orders

  • The certificate of confirmation of grant is revoked.
  • Titles for land parcels Kasipul/Kokwanyo/1451 & 1452 are cancelled and revert to Kasipul/Kokwanyo/884 in the deceased's name.