[2021] KEHC 7394 (KLR)
The court found that there was no evidence before it of any outstanding debts or bills that would justify withholding the transfer of the estate assets to the beneficiaries. The executrices had previously sworn a joint affidavit for confirmation of grant two years after the deceased's death, with no mention of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 7394 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lorraine Estelle Luckhurst; Respondent: Anne Millicent Mullins; Respondent: Flora Alexandra Evelyn
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 646 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Execution of Transfer Documents
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- NA Matheka
- Legal Topics
- Probate and Administration, Confirmation of Grant, Execution of Will, Distribution of Estate
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lorraine Estelle Luckhurst
Applicant
Anne Millicent Mullins
Respondent
Flora Alexandra Evelyn
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Execution of Transfer Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be directed to execute documents necessary for transfer of estate assets to beneficiaries.
- 2 Whether there are outstanding debts or bills that should prevent distribution of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no evidence before it of any outstanding debts or bills that would justify withholding the transfer of the estate assets to the beneficiaries. The executrices had previously sworn a joint affidavit for confirmation of grant two years after the deceased's death, with no mention of pending debts. No figures or supporting documents were provided by the respondent to substantiate the claim of outstanding bills. The applicant's assertion that any such debts could be settled from other assets was uncontroverted. Accordingly, the court held that there was no legal basis to delay execution of the certificate of confirmation of grant and ordered the Deputy Registrar...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The Deputy Registrar is directed to execute all documents necessary for the transfer of the properties/assets in the names of beneficiaries.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NUMBER 646 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE PATRICIA AMELIA LUCKHURST
RULING
1. The application before me is the summons dated 8th November 2019 brought under Section 47 of the Law of Succession Act Rules 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules; Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all enabling laws.
2. The application Lorraine Estelle Luckhurst, one of the beneficiaries of the Estate of Patricia Amelia Luckhurst also known as Patricia Amelia Morrison (deceased) seeks the order:-
That the Deputy Registrar be directed to execute all the documents necessary for the transfer of the properties/assets in the names of beneficiaries.
3. She has sworn affidavit on 8th November 2019 supporting the application and further explaining the grounds on the face of the summons:-
(i) That the grant of probate was confirmed on 31st October 2018.
(ii) That as at 8th November 2019 the executrices/trustees had not transferred the estate to the beneficiaries to be detriment of the beneficiaries.
4. She deponed that one of the Executrices by name Anne Millicent Mullins had by letter to her advocates, Shapley & Barret indicated that she would not transfer the properties before the debts of the estate had been settled. According to the applicant the transfer of the assets in the certificate of confirmation of grant would not prejudice the interests of the creditors to the estate and in any event there were other assets other than the ones in the certificate of confirmation of grant out of which any debts, would be settled. She annexed to her affidavit the letter dated 3rd June, 2019 from Shapley, Barret and Company, Advocates indicating that pending reimbursement from the estate were;
(i) Funeral expenses
(ii) Memorial expenses for the services held for the deceased.
(iii) Remuneration for the deceased’s employees up to the time of her death.
(iv) Legal fees pertaining to the estate.
(v) The letter also indicated that their client Ms. Anne Mullins, had also informed them that the other Executrix Ms. Flora Alexandra Evelyn had moved to Mombasa, and any transfer would require both their signatures.
(vi) Letter is stated that in order to proceed with distribution of the assets, their client the Executrix requested that the above listed items be settled.
5. The record shows that Amelia died on 26th April 2015 leaving a written Will. Grant of Probate was issued to both Executrices on 15th February 2016.
6. The two filed Summons for Confirmation of Grant on 10th April 2017.
7. On 31st October 2018 a Certificate of Confirmation of Grant was issued pursuant to the summons for confirmation of grant.
8. In the Summons for Confirmation of Grant, the executrices identified the estate, its beneficiaries and their respective shares and proceeded to distribute the same accordingly. It is noteworthy that, Amelia made provision in the will for the settlement of the above items but there is no mention of any pending bill/debts of the estate in the joint affidavit of the executrices sworn on 28th February 2017, two years after Amelia’s death.
9. It is also noteworthy that despite being served, the firm of Shapley Barret for Ms. Mullins did not file any response and did not provide any evidence on the alleged outstanding unpaid bills, which in any event ought to have been settled before they filed the Summons for Confirmation of Grant leaving only the residue of the state for distribution.
10. The fact that they swore a joint two (2) years after the death of Amelia, to distribute the estate, appears sufficient evidence that no bills were outstanding by then such and any that may have been incurred subsequent to the confirmation of the grant out to have been brought to the attention of the court, with a proposal of the manner of payment of the same. As it is now, no figures have been given by Ms. Mullins, and Ms. Evelyn appears to have completed her duty when the certificate of confirmation of grant was issued. It is clearly evident that there is nothing before the court to show that there are outstanding bills to be paid.
11. The applicant has deponed that should there be any bills that are outstanding there are assets available for the settlement of such bills. That fact has not been controverted,
12. As the matter stands, nothing has been placed before court to stop the execution of the certificate of confirmation of grant made on 31st October 2018 at the behest of the two executrices.
13. The application Dated 8th November 2018 is allowed. The Deputy Registrar High be and is hereby directed to execute all the documents necessary for the transfer of the properties/assets in the names of beneficiaries.
14. No orders as to costs.
Dated, Delivered Via ZOOM this 27th day of April, 2021.
Mumbua T. Matheka
Judge
In the presence of;
Edna Court Assistant
Ms. Wanjiru for the applicant
NA for M/S Sharpley Barret & Co. Advocates
Mumbua T. Matheka
Judge