[2022] KEHC 13615 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 13615 (KLR)

The court found that the respondents, as executors, were dealing with estate income to the exclusion of the applicant and in a manner that suggested personal ownership, which amounted to intermeddling under section 45(1) of the Law of Succession Act. The court held that all executors have a fiduciary responsibility...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 13615 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Young Iteba Makone; Respondent: Bathseba Mokeira Makone; Respondent: Charles Osoro Makone
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 302 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Joint Account and Accounts by Administrators
Outcome
application allowed with costs to the applicant
Judges
AO Muchelule
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Executor Duties, Accounting by Administrators, Intermeddling With Estate, Fiduciary Duties
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Administration of Estates Executor Duties Accounting by Administrators Intermeddling With Estate Fiduciary Duties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Young Iteba Makone

Applicant

Bathseba Mokeira Makone

Respondent

Charles Osoro Makone

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Joint Account and Accounts by Administrators

  1. 1 Whether the respondents, as executors, are required to account for rental and dividend income from the estate properties.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents' use of estate income for personal needs constitutes intermeddling under section 45(1) of the Law of Succession Act.
  3. 3 Whether a joint bank account should be opened for all estate income and proceeds.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents, as executors, were dealing with estate income to the exclusion of the applicant and in a manner that suggested personal ownership, which amounted to intermeddling under section 45(1) of the Law of Succession Act. The court held that all executors have a fiduciary responsibility to account for and safeguard estate assets for the benefit of all beneficiaries, not for personal use. The excuses advanced by the respondents, including personal needs and alleged statutory nominations, were rejected as insufficient and unsupported. The court emphasized its supervisory role over the administration of estates and ordered the opening of a joint bank account for...

Court Disposition

application allowed with costs to the applicant

Orders

  • The applicant and respondents shall within 30 days jointly open an account in a reputable bank into which all rent, dividends, and other estate proceeds shall be deposited.
  • Within 60 days, the respondents shall file and serve a full and accurate inventory of the assets and liabilities of the deceased and a full and accurate account of all their dealings therewith, including rents and dividends, up to the date of account.