[2025] KEHC 6346 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 6346 (KLR)

The court found that although there was an alleged Will, it was not proved as the signature was found to differ from that of the deceased, and the parties proceeded on the basis of intestate succession. The identification of beneficiaries and assets was not in dispute, except for certain properties excluded from the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 6346 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Charles Osoro Makone; Respondent: Young Iteba Makone; Applicant: Joyce Nyangara Mogere; Applicant: Norah Moraa Mageto; Applicant: Maureen Mongina Kebati
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 302 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Grant of letters of administration intestate confirmed; estate distributed as per court's orders.
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Testate and Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Identification of Beneficiaries, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Testate and Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Identification of Beneficiaries Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Osoro Makone

Applicant

Young Iteba Makone

Respondent

Joyce Nyangara Mogere

Applicant

Norah Moraa Mageto

Applicant

Maureen Mongina Kebati

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the estate of Patroba Makone Ombese should be distributed as per the alleged Will or as intestate succession.
  2. 2 What is the proper mode of distribution of the deceased's estate among the surviving beneficiaries.
  3. 3 Whether the properties and shares forming the estate have been properly identified and agreed upon by the beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although there was an alleged Will, it was not proved as the signature was found to differ from that of the deceased, and the parties proceeded on the basis of intestate succession. The identification of beneficiaries and assets was not in dispute, except for certain properties excluded from the proceedings. The court considered the competing proposals for distribution and determined that the estate should be distributed equitably among the five surviving children. The Nairobi apartments were awarded to the three sisters in equal shares, Gesima Farm and Borabu Nyamira plot to Charles and Young in equal shares, Suna East plot absolutely to Joyce, and all shares and...

Court Disposition

Grant of letters of administration intestate confirmed; estate distributed as per court's orders.

Orders

  • Gesima Farm LR No 208 and Plot No 30 Borabu Nyamira to be shared equally between Charles Makone and Young Makone.
  • LR No 2/125 Kilimani, LR No 209/10611 Block 7 Flat No 5, and LR No 209/10611 Block 7 Flat No 1 (Nairobi apartments) to be shared equally among Joyce Makone, Norah Makone, and Maureen Makone.