[2019] KEHC 2704 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2704 (KLR)

The court found that, despite the consent and proposed schedule of distribution signed by all beneficiaries, only one parcel of land—South Sakwa/Barkowino/4279—was actually registered in the name of the deceased at the time of his death. All other parcels listed in the schedule and consent were either transferred to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2704 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Otieno Ajulu; Applicant: Daniel Stephen Orwa Ajulu; Respondent: Janet Aoko Afwayo; Respondent: Jared Otieno Ajulu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Directions for Distribution of the Estate
Outcome
Schedule of distribution and consent rejected; administrators directed to file a fresh schedule distributing only the asset registered in the deceased's name.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Land Title Verification
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Land Title Verification

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Otieno Ajulu

Applicant

Daniel Stephen Orwa Ajulu

Applicant

Janet Aoko Afwayo

Respondent

Jared Otieno Ajulu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Directions for Distribution of the Estate

  1. 1 Whether the parcels of land listed in the schedule of distribution are available for distribution to the beneficiaries of the deceased's estate.
  2. 2 Whether the consent and schedule of distribution dated 13/8/2019 accurately reflect the assets of the deceased's estate.
  3. 3 Whether the administrators should file a fresh schedule of distribution limited to assets actually registered in the name of the deceased.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, despite the consent and proposed schedule of distribution signed by all beneficiaries, only one parcel of land—South Sakwa/Barkowino/4279—was actually registered in the name of the deceased at the time of his death. All other parcels listed in the schedule and consent were either transferred to third parties prior to the deceased's death or otherwise not registered in his name, and thus could not lawfully form part of the estate for distribution. The court held that the administrators must file a fresh schedule of distribution limited to the only asset forming part of the estate, and rejected the previous schedule and consent as erroneous and unsupported by the...

Court Disposition

Schedule of distribution and consent rejected; administrators directed to file a fresh schedule distributing only the asset registered in the deceased's name.

Orders

  • The schedule of distribution and consent to the mode of distribution dated 13/8/2019 are rejected and struck out.
  • Administrators Peter Otieno Ajulu and Daniel Stephen Orwa Ajulu are directed to file a fresh schedule of distribution limited to land parcel South Sakwa/Barkowino/4279 among all four beneficiaries.