[2024] KEHC 15392 (KLR)
The court held that while section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules limit rectification to errors in names and descriptions, the inclusion of a previously omitted asset is a substantive change that ordinarily requires a review of the confirmation orders. However,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 15392 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jennifer Philomena Fernandes; Applicant: Jenipet Yvonne Bridget Fernandes
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause E2985 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
- Outcome
- summons for rectification allowed
- Judges
- EKO Ogola
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Grant, Probate and Administration, Certificate of Confirmation, Errors in Grant, Distribution of Estate
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jennifer Philomena Fernandes
Applicant
Jenipet Yvonne Bridget Fernandes
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the omission of an asset from the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant can be rectified under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules.
- 2 Whether the inclusion of newly discovered assets constitutes a rectifiable error or requires a substantive review of the confirmation orders.
- 3 Whether the court can invoke its inherent jurisdiction to allow rectification for the ends of justice.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules limit rectification to errors in names and descriptions, the inclusion of a previously omitted asset is a substantive change that ordinarily requires a review of the confirmation orders. However, invoking its inherent jurisdiction under Rule 73, the court found it just to allow rectification in this instance, as all beneficiaries had consented and the omission was apparent. The Certificate of Confirmation of Grant was ordered to be rectified to include the 36,597 Ordinary Shares at Old Mutual Insurance Company Limited, to be shared equally between the applicants.
Court Disposition
summons for rectification allowed
Orders
- The Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 9th October 2023 shall be rectified to include 36,597 Ordinary Shares at Old Mutual Insurance Company Limited, to be shared equally between Jennifer Philomena Fernandes and Jenipet Yvonne Bridget Fernandes.
- Costs be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
In re Estate of Peter Athanasius Fernandes (Deceased) (Succession Cause E2985 of 2022) [2024] KEHC 15392 (KLR) (Family) (12 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 15392 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Family
Succession Cause E2985 of 2022
EKO Ogola, J
November 12, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PETER ATHANASIUS FERNANDES (DECEASED)
In the matter of
Jennifer Philomena Fernandes
1st Applicant
Jenipet Yvonne Bridget Fernandes
2nd Applicant
Ruling
1. The Summons for rectification before this court is dated 17th July 2024. The applicants pray for the following orders:-a.That the file (Succ. Cause No. E2985 of 2022) to be reopened for the purposes of Rectification of the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant dated 9th October 2023. b.That the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant issued to the said administratixes in this matter on the 9th day of October 2023 be rectified to include the following as provided for by Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules;Name Description of Property Shares of Heirs
Jennifer Philomena FernandesJenipet Yvonne Bridget Fernandes 36,597 Ordinary Shares at Old Mutual Insurance Company Limited Equal Shares
2. The Summons was based on the applicants’ joint supporting affidavit. They deposed that there was an error apparent on the face of the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant, which left out the above-named property. The applicants annexed to their affidavit consent from the beneficiaries on the mode of distribution of the said shares.
Determination 3. Rectification of grants is provided for in section 74 of the Law of Succession Act, Cap 160, Laws of Kenya and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. Section 74 provides as follows:“74. Errors may be rectified by court:
Errors in names and descriptions, or in setting forth the time and place of the deceased’s death, or the purpose in a limited grant, may be rectified by the court, and the grant of representation, whether before or after confirmation, may be altered and amended accordingly.”
4. Rule 43(1) provides as follows:“Where the holder of a grant seeks pursuant to the provisions of section 74 of the Act rectification of an error in the grant as to the names or descriptions of any person or thing or as to the time or place of death of the deceased or, in the case of a limited grant, the purpose for which the grant was made, he shall apply by summons in Form 110 for such rectification through the registry and in the cause in which the grant was made.”
5. From the language of section 74 and Rule 43(1), the scope of rectification of grants of representation is limited to errors in names and descriptions of property. The inclusion of assets of the deceased does not fall within the meaning of the aforementioned provisions.
6. If there is discovery of new assets that were not available or had not been discovered at the time of distribution, among others; it would be imprudent to seek rectification or alteration or amendment of the certificate of confirmation of grant. Such changes are fundamental, not superficial. They go to the core of the distribution. They cannot be affected without touching the orders made by the court at the distribution of the estate. Consequently, such changes cannot and should not be affected through a mere amendment of the certificate of confirmation of grant. The proper approach ought to be an application for review of the orders made at the confirmation of the grant.
7. However, this Court is still clothed with jurisdiction to issue orders that will meet the end of justice. Rule 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules provides that:-“Nothing in these Rules shall limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the court.”
8. The upshot is that the Summons for Rectification dated 17th July 2024 are allowed. Certificate of Confirmation of Grant to be rectified forthwith according to prayer (b) of the Summons. Costs be in the cause.Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 12THDAY OF NOVEMBER 2024E.K. OGOLAJUDGEIn the presence of:Ms. Wachira for the ApplicantsMs Gisiele M court Assistant