[2021] KEHC 5478 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5478 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had previously filed an identical application seeking the same relief, which was not withdrawn or prosecuted. The existence of two similar applications before the same court constitutes an abuse of court process. Additionally, the court noted that the funds in question are held by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5478 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Angela Wambui Nderito; Respondent: John Kangethe Nderito; Respondent: Florence Auma Nderito; Respondent: Elizabeth Wariara Nderito
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 307 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Interim Maintenance and Release of Share Dividends
Outcome
application struck out
Judges
JV Juma
Legal Topics
Succession Estate Administration, Interim Maintenance, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Estate Administration Interim Maintenance Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Angela Wambui Nderito

Applicant

John Kangethe Nderito

Respondent

Florence Auma Nderito

Respondent

Elizabeth Wariara Nderito

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Interim Maintenance and Release of Share Dividends

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to interim release of Kshs. 200,000 from estate dividends for maintenance and rent arrears.
  2. 2 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of court process due to duplication of previous applications.
  3. 3 Whether the court can grant the orders sought before confirmation of grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had previously filed an identical application seeking the same relief, which was not withdrawn or prosecuted. The existence of two similar applications before the same court constitutes an abuse of court process. Additionally, the court noted that the funds in question are held by the Unclaimed Financial Assets Authority and cannot be released until the grant is confirmed. The court emphasized that piecemeal distribution of the estate is inappropriate and that the matter should proceed to final determination rather than through multiple interim applications. Consequently, the court declined to grant the orders sought and struck out the application in its...

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 3rd November 2020 is struck out in its entirety.
  • No orders as to costs.