[2022] KEHC 26995 (KLR)
The court found that the continued refusal by Karen Wambui Gicheru and James Kamau Gicheru to sign the requisite sale and transfer documents had unjustifiably delayed the distribution of the estate allocated to the 1st House, despite clear court orders and the agreement of the majority of beneficiaries. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 26995 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Susan Wairimu Gicheru; Applicant: Mary Wanjiku Gicheru; Applicant: Jane Heta Nielsen; Applicant: Monica Wanjiru Collins; Applicant: Leah Ngendo Komu; Respondent: Stanley Mathu Gicheru; Respondent: Moses Muthiora Gicheru; Respondent: James Kamau Gicheru; Respondent: Stephen Kinoro Gicheru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 376 of 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Execution of Sale and Transfer Documents by Deputy Registrar
- Outcome
- applications allowed
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Grant of Letters of Administration, Distribution of Estate, Powers of Administrator
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Wairimu Gicheru
Applicant
Mary Wanjiku Gicheru
Applicant
Jane Heta Nielsen
Applicant
Monica Wanjiru Collins
Applicant
Leah Ngendo Komu
Applicant
Stanley Mathu Gicheru
Respondent
Moses Muthiora Gicheru
Respondent
James Kamau Gicheru
Respondent
Stephen Kinoro Gicheru
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Applications for Execution of Sale and Transfer Documents by Deputy Registrar
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar should be authorized to sign sale and transfer documents for estate properties in place of non-cooperating co-administrators.
- 2 Whether the refusal by certain co-administrators to sign documents justifies court intervention to facilitate distribution of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the continued refusal by Karen Wambui Gicheru and James Kamau Gicheru to sign the requisite sale and transfer documents had unjustifiably delayed the distribution of the estate allocated to the 1st House, despite clear court orders and the agreement of the majority of beneficiaries. The court held that administrators have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the estate and beneficiaries, and that the non-cooperation of a minority cannot be allowed to frustrate the administration of the estate. In the absence of any valid explanation or demonstrated prejudice, and to bring finality to a matter pending for over forty years, the court exercised its discretion...
Court Disposition
applications allowed
Orders
- Karen Wambui Gicheru and James Kamau Gicheru to sign the requisite documentation to transfer the portion of the estate due to the 1st House within twenty-one (21) days, subject to written consent being filed in court.
- If they fail to sign within the stipulated period, the Deputy Registrar is authorized to sign the sale and transfer documents on their behalf.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
59 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO 376 OF 1983
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PETER GICHERU KAGOCHO
SUSAN WAIRIMU GICHERU
MARY WANJIKU GICHERU
JANE HETA NIELSEN
MONICA WANJIRU COLLINS
LEAH NGENDO KOMU....................................................................APPLICANTS
VERSUS
STANLEY MATHU GICHERU
MOSES MUTHIORA GICHERU
JAMES KAMAU GICHERU
STEPHEN KINORO GICHERU....................................................RESPONDENTS
RULING
1. Before this Court for determination are two applications as follows
(i). Summons dated 11th March 2021 by which the Applicant MOSES MUTHIORA GITHERU sought the following orders:-
“a. Spent.
b. THAT the Honourable court do issue an order allowing the Deputy Registrar to sign the sale agreement and transfer documents in respect of Land Reference No. 88 and 89 Section III situate in the City of Nairobi.
c. THAT this Honourable court be pleased to issue an order to allow the Deputy Registrar to sign sale and transfer documents in respect to the estate properties being RIARA RIDGE/4967/8, LIMURU/BIBIRIONI T.635, TING’ANG’A PLOT 479, TINGANGA PLOT II, KIAMBU 134 (1/2), KIAMBU MUNICIPALITY BLOCK 5/KIAMUMBI) 674, KIAMBU MUNICIPALITY BLOCK 5/KIAMUMBI) 1075, NEW PAVILLION ESTATES LIMITED 34. 5 SHARES, GATATHA FARMERS CO. LTD, 49 SHARES, RIOKO ESTATE (1970) LTD, 38 SHARES, GEMA HOLDINGS LIMITED, I SHARE, THOME NO. 4 (1167), RUMURUTI LAIKIPIA 10 ACRES, NDUMBERI/TING’ANG’A A 339, 50 SHARES AND NDUMBERI/TING’ANG’A A/248, 50 SHARES”.
2. The Application which was premised upon Section 47 of the Law of Succession ActandRule 73of theProbate and Administration Rules was supported by the Affidavit of even date sworn by the Applicant.
(ii) Summons dated9th April 2021by which the ApplicantMOSES MUTHIORA GITHERUsought the following orders:-
a) Spent.
b) THAT the Honourable court do issue an order allowing the Deputy Registrar to sign the sale agreement and transfer documents in respect of Land Reference No. 88 and 89 Section III situate in the City of Nairobi.
c) THAT this Honourable court be pleased to issue an order to allow the Deputy Registrar to sign sale and transfer documents in respect to the estate properties in place of Karen Wambui Gicheru being RIARA RIDGE/4967/8, LIMURU/BIBIRIONI T.635, TING’ANG’A PLOT 479, TINGANGA PLOT II, KIAMBU 134 (1/2), KIAMBU MUNICIPALITY BLOCK 5/KIAMUMBI) 1075, NEW PAVILLION ESTATES LIMITED 34. 5 SHARES, GATATHA FARMERS CO. LTD, 49 SHARES, RIOKO ESTATE (3970) LTD, 38 SHARES, GEMA HOLDINGS LIMITED, I SHARE, THOME NO. 4 (1167), RUMURUTI LAIKIPIA 10 ACRES, NDUMBERI/TING’ANG’A A 339, 50 SHARES AND NDUMBERI/TING’ANG’A A/248, 50 SHARES”.
3. The Application which was premised upon Section 47 of the Law of Succession ActandRule 73of theProbate and Administration Rules was supported by the Affidavit of even date sworn by the Applicant.
4. Both applications were opposed by the Respondent/Co-Administrator KAREN WAMBUI GICHERU vide her Grounds of Opposition dated 12th May 2021. The Applications were canvassed by way of written submissions. The Applicants filed their written submissions dated 28th October 2021 whilst the Respondent relied upon her written submissions dated 26th November 2021.
BACKGROUND
5. This Succession Cause relates to the estate of PETER GICHERU KAGOCHO (hereinafter ‘the Deceased’) who died intestate on 24th April 1979. The Deceased was survived by two (2) widows –
(a) SUSAN WAIRIMU GICHERU – the 1st Wife
(b) KAREN WAMBUI GICHERU – the 2nd wife
6. The Deceased was also survived by several children. Following the demise of the Deceased Grant of letters of Administration Intestate was made to his two widows which Grant was duly confirmed on 8th February 1989 and later rectified on 22nd October 2012. The Certificate of Confirmed Grant was again rectified on 10th March 2021 to include the four (4) Administrators, namely-
(i) Moses Muthiora Gicheru
(ii)Mary Wanjiku
(iii)Karen Wambui Gicheru
(iv)James Kamau Gicheru
7. The second House of Karen Wambui Gicheru apparently had no issues and proceeded to distribute amongst themselves the portion of the estate, which had been allocated to the 2nd House.
8. However the 1st House of Susan Wairimu Gicheru remained embroiled in a tussle on how to distribute their portion of the estate. Out of the ten (10) children of the 1st house nine (9) agreed on how to share the properties. However, the 1st son JAMES KAMAU has remained adamantly opposed to the mode of distribution suggested by his siblings.
9. Vide a Ruling dated 30th January 2020 Hon Lady Justice Ali-Aroni settled the tussle between the members of the 1st House and issued a confirmed Grant indicating the mode of distribution of the portion of the estate which had been allocated to the 1st House.
10. Thereafter,Moses Muthiora Githeru and Mary Wanjiku Gicheru who are both Administrators of the estate of the Deceased filed the two applications dated 11th March 2021 and the other dated 9th April 2021 seeking identical orders.
11. In his supporting Affidavit Moses Muthiora Githeruaverred that he and his co-Administrator Mary Wanjiku Gicheruare desirous of selling of LR No. 88and89 Section IIIsituate in the City of Nairobi in order to settle debts owed by the estate and to cover expenses which will arise from the distribution of the estate. He stated that Karen Wambui Gicheru who is his stepmother is not willing to execute documents required to facilitate the sale process.
12. The Applicants submit that Karen Wambui Gicheru is only a co-administrator for the purposes of distribution of the portion of the estate due to the 1st House as the share due to the 2nd House had been fully distributed that therefore neither she nor the beneficiaries from the 2nd House have any interest in any of the properties to be sold.
13. In order to move forward to conclude the distribution of the estate as per the Ruling of 30th January 2020, the Applicants pray for orders directing the Hon Deputy Registrar to sign the documents necessary to facilitate the sale of the property and the distribution of the estate on behalf of Karen Wambui Gicheru and James Kamau Gicheru.
Analysis and Determination
14. I have carefully considered the two applications filed by the Applicants as well as the grounds of Opposition filed by the Respondent. I note that neither Karen Wambui Gicheru nor James Kamau Gicheru filed any Replying Affidavit in opposition to the applications.
15. It is not in dispute that the delay in concluding the distribution of this estate is due to the wrangles in the 1st House. The 2nd House have no problem and have successfully distributed the portion of the estate which had been allocated to them. None of the members of the 2nd House has any interest (and none has been claimed) in the properties which were allocated to the 1st House. Therefore the 2nd House stands to suffer no prejudice if the orders sought in the two applications are granted.
16. Moses Muthiora Gicheru has averred that he has the authority of all his siblings save for James Kamau Gicheru to file these applications on their behalf. That nine (9) out of the ten (10) siblings are agreed that the properties LR No 88and89 be sold for the stated purposes.
17. I am mindful of the fact that this is an extremely old matter. The Deceased died way back in 1979. Almost forty(40)down the line distribution of the estate of the Deceased still has not been settled. My learned sister Hon Lady Justice Ali-Aronigave clear guidance in her Ruling dated 30th January 2020 regarding the mode of distribution of the portion of the estate allocated to the 1st House. The only reason which said distribution still remains pending is the refusal by the co-administrators to co-operate with the Applicants to bring this matter to an end.
18. I have perused the Grounds of Opposition dated 12th May 2021. In my view, the same has no merit. If as suggested the said Karen Wambui GicheruandJames Kamau Gicheruwere agreeable to signing the requisite documents then why have they not done so until now? The very filing of this application has been necessitated by their refusal to co-operate with the Applicants in distributing the estate due to the 1st House. It is unfair for Karen Wambui Gicheruhaving overseen the distribution of the portion of the estate allocated to her house to effectively block the distribution of the portion of the estate due to the 1st House. In respect to James Kamau Gicheruit would appear that he has a strained relationship with his siblings and has adamantly refused to agree with them on the way forward. The bottom line is that the reluctance of the two Respondents has led to the warranted protraction of this case and has caused the unwarranted delays in finalizing this Succession Cause.
19. The arguments raised by the Respondents regarding the manner in which Mr Seth Ojienda Advocates came on record in this matter amounts to mere prevarication.
20. The firm Ojienda & Company came on record in this matter vide the Notice of Entry of Appearance filed on 20th July 2015. The Respondents have not in the past eight (8) years taken any issue with the appearance of Mr Ojienda in this matter. This argument is nothing but a red herring raised in an attempt to divert the courts attention from the lapses and failures of the Respondents as co-administrator. The Respondents do not hold brief for the firm of Mr Njenga & Co. Advocates and have no authority to demand payments of legal fees on behalf of said firm.
21. The powers and duties of personal representatives and/or Administrators are set out in Sections 82and83 of the Law of Succession Act Cap 160, Laws of Kenya. An Administrator is in a fiduciary positon with regard to the estate of a Deceased person and is at all times required to act in the best interest of the estate.
22. Since the Ruling delivered on 30th January 2020 neither Karen Wambui GicherunorJames Kamau Gicheru have sought audience in court to explain any difficulty they may be experiencing with complying with the courts direction on distribution of the estate. Instead, the two opted to sabotage the courts orders by declining to sign the documents required to facilitate transmission of the estate to the rightful beneficiaries from the 1st House
23. Finally, I find merit in the two applications. I direct that Karen Wambui GicheruandJames Kamau Gicherusign the requisite documentation to transfer the portion of the estate due to the 1st House subject to a written consent being filed in court to sign the sale and transfer documents for LR Nos 88and89 Section III City of Nairobi. The documents to be signed within twenty-one (21) days failing which the Hon Deputy Registrar is authorized to sign the said documents on behalf of the Respondents. No orders on costs.
DATED IN NAIROBI THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2022.
.........................................
MAUREEN A. ODERO
JUDGE