[2020] KEHC 8397 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8397 (KLR)

The court found that the application was fundamentally flawed because the person against whom the complaints were made, Silas Okanga, was neither named as a respondent nor served with the application. There was no evidence connecting the administratrix to the alleged acts. Granting the application would amount to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8397 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Simon Indoko Machinji; Respondent: Mary Kerubo Machinji
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 770 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons Dated 14th November 2019
Outcome
summons dismissed
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Right to Be Heard, Distribution of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Administration of Estates Right to Be Heard Distribution of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Indoko Machinji

Applicant

Mary Kerubo Machinji

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons Dated 14th November 2019

  1. 1 Whether the summons dated 14th November 2019 can be granted against the administratrix in the absence of evidence connecting her to the alleged acts.
  2. 2 Whether it is proper to determine the application without serving Silas Okanga, the person against whom the complaints are made.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was fundamentally flawed because the person against whom the complaints were made, Silas Okanga, was neither named as a respondent nor served with the application. There was no evidence connecting the administratrix to the alleged acts. Granting the application would amount to condemning Silas Okanga unheard, contrary to the principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that parties should focus on distributing the estate rather than filing applications that delay the finalization of the matter. Consequently, the summons dated 14th November 2019 was dismissed for lack of merit and procedural fairness.

Court Disposition

summons dismissed

Orders

  • The summons dated 14th November 2019 is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.