[2020] KEHC 8001 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8001 (KLR)

The court declined to grant injunctive orders as the land in question had not been surveyed or demarcated, making enforcement impractical. The court also declined to compel all respondents to account for estate assets, as not all were administrators. However, the court granted orders for the County Surveyor to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8001 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nashon Chesoli Mukulo; Respondent: Indangasi Patrick Mukulo; Respondent: Joseph Wechuli Mukulo; Respondent: Francis Tuya Mukulo; Respondent: Timothy Shayo Mukulo; Respondent: Edward Akaya Mukulo; Respondent: Benard Mabia Mukulo; Respondent: Juliana Wanjaya Mukulo; Respondent: Pasilita Mukulo; Respondent: Mary Mukulo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 554 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Injunctive and Administrative Orders in Estate Administration
Outcome
Application partly allowed; prayers 2, 4, and 5 granted conditionally; prayers 1, 3, and 6 declined.
Judges
CM Njagi
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Beneficiary Rights, Land Demarcation, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Administration of Estates Confirmation of Grant Beneficiary Rights Land Demarcation Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nashon Chesoli Mukulo

Applicant

Indangasi Patrick Mukulo

Respondent

Joseph Wechuli Mukulo

Respondent

Francis Tuya Mukulo

Respondent

Timothy Shayo Mukulo

Respondent

Edward Akaya Mukulo

Respondent

Benard Mabia Mukulo

Respondent

Juliana Wanjaya Mukulo

Respondent

Pasilita Mukulo

Respondent

Mary Mukulo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Injunctive and Administrative Orders in Estate Administration

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to injunctive orders restraining the respondents from interfering with the portion of land awarded to him.
  2. 2 Whether the court should direct the County Surveyor to demarcate the land in accordance with the certificate of confirmation of grant.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents should be compelled to account for certain estate assets and share survey and related costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to grant injunctive orders as the land in question had not been surveyed or demarcated, making enforcement impractical. The court also declined to compel all respondents to account for estate assets, as not all were administrators. However, the court granted orders for the County Surveyor to demarcate the land and for the Deputy Registrar to sign necessary documents, recognizing the applicant's right to his share as per the confirmed grant and the need to facilitate administration where co-administrators are uncooperative. The court also granted police protection for the survey exercise, conditional on payment of requisite fees by the applicant. Orders for respondents...

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed; prayers 2, 4, and 5 granted conditionally; prayers 1, 3, and 6 declined.

Orders

  • The Kakamega County Land Surveyor is directed to visit and demarcate parcel KABRAS/LUKUME/287 in accordance with the certificate of confirmation of grant, subject to payment of requisite fees by the applicant.
  • The OCS Kakamega Police Station shall oversee the survey and demarcation exercise.