[2015] KEHC 1702 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1702 (KLR)

The court found that, while certain beneficiaries had historically resided on the family land with the deceased's consent, this fact alone did not justify excluding other beneficiaries from equal entitlement to the estate. The Law of Succession Act and the Constitution require non-discriminatory distribution among...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 1702 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Michael Wainaina Ndung’u; Applicant: Mercy Njeri Wainaina; Applicant: Priscillah Wambui Wainaina; Applicant: Alice Njeri Kamau; Respondent: Stephen Mburu Wainaina; Respondent: Gladwell Wairimu Muthee; Respondent: Elizabeth Waithira Ndung’u; Respondent: Rosemary Mwihaki Ndung’u
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 2432 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate
Outcome
Grant confirmed and estate distributed as per court's orders and parties' partial consent.
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Succession, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Beneficiary Rights, Matrimonial Property, Equal Sharing
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Distribution of Estate Confirmation of Grant Beneficiary Rights Matrimonial Property Equal Sharing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Wainaina Ndung’u

Applicant

Mercy Njeri Wainaina

Applicant

Priscillah Wambui Wainaina

Applicant

Alice Njeri Kamau

Applicant

Stephen Mburu Wainaina

Respondent

Gladwell Wairimu Muthee

Respondent

Elizabeth Waithira Ndung’u

Respondent

Rosemary Mwihaki Ndung’u

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Distribution of Estate

  1. 1 Whether the proposed mode of distribution of the deceased's estate is fair and in accordance with the law of succession.
  2. 2 Whether married daughters are entitled to equal shares as sons in the distribution of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether the existing occupation and use of the family land by certain beneficiaries should affect the distribution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, while certain beneficiaries had historically resided on the family land with the deceased's consent, this fact alone did not justify excluding other beneficiaries from equal entitlement to the estate. The Law of Succession Act and the Constitution require non-discriminatory distribution among all children, regardless of gender or marital status. The court accepted the parties' partial consent on the distribution of some properties and resolved the contested properties by balancing the need to respect existing occupation with the legal requirement for equality. The family land (Kabete/Nyathuna/155) was to be distributed among the four historically resident...

Court Disposition

Grant confirmed and estate distributed as per court's orders and parties' partial consent.

Orders

  • Kabete/Nyathuna/155 to be distributed equally among Michael Wainaina Ndung’u, Stephen Mburu Wainaina, Gladwell Wairimu Muthee (for Paul Muthee Ndung’u's family), and Elizabeth Waithira Ndung’u & Rosemary Mwihaki Ndung’u (for Nancy Gathoni Ndung’u's family).
  • L.R. No. 36/111/1169 (Eastleigh) to be let to tenants and proceeds shared equally among the 7 beneficiaries.