[2023] KEHC 22111 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 22111 (KLR)

The court held that the amendments sought by the applicant went beyond the permissible scope of rectification under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act. The application sought to substitute the administrator and fundamentally alter the beneficiaries and mode of distribution of the estate, which are not minor...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 22111 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lucy Wambui Mbugua; Respondent: David Muiruri Kimani Mbugua (Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1033 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
EKO Ogola
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Probate and Administration, Distribution of Estate
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Probate and Administration Distribution of Estate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lucy Wambui Mbugua

Applicant

David Muiruri Kimani Mbugua (Deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the rectification of grant can be used to substitute the administrator and alter the beneficiaries and mode of distribution of the estate.
  2. 2 Whether the amendments sought fall within the permissible scope of rectification under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the amendments sought by the applicant went beyond the permissible scope of rectification under section 74 of the Law of Succession Act. The application sought to substitute the administrator and fundamentally alter the beneficiaries and mode of distribution of the estate, which are not minor errors or misdescriptions. Such substantive changes cannot be effected through rectification but may require a review of the confirmed grant under Order 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Therefore, the summons for rectification of grant lacked merit and was dismissed in its entirety.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Summons for Rectification of Grant dated February 23, 2023 is dismissed in its entirety.
  • Costs of the application be in the cause.