[2024] KEHC 5137 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 5137 (KLR)

The court found that the application for limited grant ad coligenda bona, filed two years after the deceased's death, did not demonstrate urgency. After the duty judge declined to certify the application as urgent and referred the matter to the Siaya High Court, the applicants failed to take any further steps to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 5137 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: William Sidigu Onyango; Respondent: Estate of Pitalis Adol Orege alias Adol Orege (Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Succession Cause E005 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Succession Cause / Ruling on Unprosecuted Application for Limited Grant Ad Coligenda Bona
Outcome
Application closed and file archived due to lack of prosecution and absence of urgency.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Succession Procedure, Limited Grant Ad Coligenda Bona, Urgency in Succession Matters
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Procedure Limited Grant Ad Coligenda Bona Urgency in Succession Matters

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Sidigu Onyango

Applicant

Estate of Pitalis Adol Orege alias Adol Orege (Deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Succession Cause / Ruling on Unprosecuted Application for Limited Grant Ad Coligenda Bona

  1. 1 Whether the application for limited grant ad coligenda bona should be considered urgent two years after the deceased's death.
  2. 2 Whether the application should remain pending where the applicants have failed to prosecute it.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for limited grant ad coligenda bona, filed two years after the deceased's death, did not demonstrate urgency. After the duty judge declined to certify the application as urgent and referred the matter to the Siaya High Court, the applicants failed to take any further steps to prosecute the application. The court exercised its discretion to close and archive the file, noting that the matter originated in Siaya and was only temporarily before Kisumu High Court due to the absence of the Siaya judge. The lack of prosecution and absence of urgency justified the closure of the application and the file.

Court Disposition

Application closed and file archived due to lack of prosecution and absence of urgency.

Orders

  • The application dated 11th May 2021 is closed for archiving.
  • The file is closed.