[2024] KEHC 14912 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 14912 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not established an arguable appeal against the judgment delivered on 19th December 2023, which determined the cause in accordance with the uncontested written will of the deceased. The court held that it could not appoint the objector as executor contrary to the deceased's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 14912 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Elaine Ogalo Ayot; Respondent: Omonde Kisera & 3 others; Prof. Henry Okello Ayot (Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 5 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay of Proceedings
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal and stay of proceedings disallowed. Costs to the respondents.
Judges
A Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Grant of Probate, Will Execution, Leave to Appeal, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Family and Children Grant of Probate Will Execution Leave to Appeal Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elaine Ogalo Ayot

Applicant

Omonde Kisera & 3 others

Respondent

Prof. Henry Okello Ayot (Deceased)

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal and Stay of Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to appeal against the High Court's judgment in a succession cause.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order for stay of proceedings pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has established an arguable appeal warranting the exercise of the court's discretion.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not established an arguable appeal against the judgment delivered on 19th December 2023, which determined the cause in accordance with the uncontested written will of the deceased. The court held that it could not appoint the objector as executor contrary to the deceased's intentions as expressed in the will. Further, the court determined that there were no ongoing proceedings for which a stay could be granted, as the matter had been concluded by the judgment. Consequently, the applications for leave to appeal and for stay of proceedings were disallowed, and costs were awarded to the respondents.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal and stay of proceedings disallowed. Costs to the respondents.

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal is disallowed.
  • Application for stay of proceedings is disallowed.