[2023] KEHC 26208 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 26208 (KLR)

The court found that the omission of certain assets from the confirmed grant and the inclusion of an asset not registered in the deceased's name constituted errors that fall within the scope of rectification permitted by section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 26208 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sigismond K. Njeru; Applicant: Henry Paul Ireri Njeru; Applicant: Christina Warue Njeru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 23 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
Application for rectification of grant allowed.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Probate and Administration, Omission of Assets, Consent of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Rectification of Grant Probate and Administration Omission of Assets Consent of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 16
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sigismond K. Njeru

Applicant

Henry Paul Ireri Njeru

Applicant

Christina Warue Njeru

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the court should rectify the confirmed grant to include omitted assets and remove an asset not registered in the deceased's name.
  2. 2 Whether the rectification sought falls within the scope permitted by section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission of certain assets from the confirmed grant and the inclusion of an asset not registered in the deceased's name constituted errors that fall within the scope of rectification permitted by section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. The applicants provided sufficient evidence, including search certificates and the consent of all adult beneficiaries, to support the rectification. The court held that the rectification was merited and ordered the removal of the asset not belonging to the deceased and the inclusion of the omitted assets, with further directions on the registration and charging of the assets...

Court Disposition

Application for rectification of grant allowed.

Orders

  • Ntima/Igoki/4330 shall be deleted from the list of deceased’s assets.
  • The grant shall be rectified to include the specified omitted assets.