[2018] KEHC 8110 (KLR)
The court found that there were no pending issues relating to the estate of Reuben Kabugu Kabanga (deceased) because the applicant had already become the registered proprietor of the two parcels of land following the confirmation of grant. The Environment and Land Court had previously dismissed the respondents'...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 8110 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Maina Kabugu; Respondent: John Kariuki Wairimu; Respondent: Lucy Wahito Wairimu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 496 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Summons General Seeking Injunctive and Possession Orders
- Outcome
- application struck out as abuse of process
- Judges
- NA Matheka
- Legal Topics
- Probate and Administration, Adverse Possession, Quiet Enjoyment, Striking Out Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Maina Kabugu
Applicant
John Kariuki Wairimu
Respondent
Lucy Wahito Wairimu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Amended Summons General Seeking Injunctive and Possession Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to injunctive and possession orders against the respondents in respect of LR Gatarakwa/Gatarakwa Block III/1316 and 1317.
- 2 Whether the application is properly before the succession court or should have been filed in the Environment and Land Court.
- 3 Whether there are any pending issues relating to the estate of Reuben Kabugu Kabanga (deceased).
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there were no pending issues relating to the estate of Reuben Kabugu Kabanga (deceased) because the applicant had already become the registered proprietor of the two parcels of land following the confirmation of grant. The Environment and Land Court had previously dismissed the respondents' claim of adverse possession, confirming the applicant's absolute and indefeasible title to the properties. Therefore, any disputes regarding possession or interference with the land were no longer matters for the succession court but for the Environment and Land Court. The application was thus an abuse of the process of the succession court and was struck out.
Court Disposition
application struck out as abuse of process
Orders
- The amended summons general dated 27th February 2017 and amended on 23rd March 2017 is struck out.
- No orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 496 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESATE OFREUBEN
KABUGU KABANGA (DECEASED)
PAUL MAINA KABUGU....................................APPLICANT
-V E R S U S -
JOHN KARIUKI WAIRIMU
LUCY WAHITO WAIRIMU.......................RESPONDENTS
R U L I N G
The amended summons general before me is dated 27th February 2017 and amended on 23rd March, 2017. It is brought under Rules 49 and 59 of the Probation and Administration Rules.
It seeks orders as set out on the face of the application: -
1. That the respondents be ordered to cease interfering by entering into and or cultivating L.R. Gatarakwa/Gatarakwa Block 111/1316and1317 and let the applicant take full possession and enjoy quiet possession of the parcels of land.
2. That in the event of disobedience of prayer (1) if granted the respondents be punished as the court may deem appropriate
3. That the respondent be condemned to pay costs.
It is supported by the affidavit of Paul Maina Kabugu sworn on 23rd March 2017.
The application was served on the respondents but despite being given time, as the record will show, they have not been able to respond to the same.
The record shows that the applicant inherited the 2 parcels of land Gatarakwa/Gatarakwa/ Bock 111/1317 and 111/1316 from his father Reuben Kabugu Kabanya (deceased). The same devolved to him under the certificate of confirmation of grant dated 29th June 2015. According to him, since then the respondents have interfered with his possession and quiet enjoyment of the two properties.
Their efforts to lay a claim to the land culminated in a suit ELC 85/2016 (OS) IN THE MATTER OF LR GATARAKWA/GATARAKWA BLOCK III/1316 AND 1317, IN THE MATTER OF S. 38 OF THE LIMITATION OF ACTIONA ACT, CAP 22 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF ACQUSITION OF LAND BY ADVERSE POSSESSION. Their claims failed as the suit was dismissed, diminishing any rights they may have claimed over the 2 parcels of land. This was clearly demonstrated by question no. (c) in the Court’s ruling, which the ELC court set to determine. That is
“whether a declaration should issue to the effect that the administration of the estate of Reuben Kabugu Kabanya (deceased) is subject of their claim to land parcels LR GATARAKWA/GATARAKWA BLOCK III/1316 AND 1317 by adverse possession?
And the court answered it in the negative.
This application is brought under rule 49 of the Probate and Administration Rules: -
“A person desiring to make an application to the court relating to the estate of a deceased person for which no provision is made elsewhere in these rules shall file a summons supported, if necessary by affidavit”.
My understanding of the rule is that the application made would be in relation to the estate of a deceased person. My humble view is that in this case there are no issues pending with regard to the Estate of Reuben Kabugu Kabanga (deceased). There is nothing that can be referred to as the estate of Reuben Kabugu Kibanya. The ELC court found that the titles issued to the applicant herein conferred absolute and indefeasible title to the two properties to him. Any matters related to the Estate of his father ended when he, the applicant herein became the registered proprietor of the two titles as there is no longer anything to be referred to as the estate of Reuben Kabugu Kabanya.
Clearly the application followed the outcome of the ELC case. The orders the applicant is seeking ought to have been sought in the ELC court, as they now relate to his possession and quiet enjoyment of his own property not his father’s property, or property that is party of his father’s estate.
My view of the matter is that in the circumstances this application as filed is an abuse of the process of this court and I proceed to strike it out, with no orders as to costs.
Dated, delivered and signed this 26th Day of January 2018 at Nyeri
TERESIA M MATHEKA
JUDGE
Court Assistant Hariet
Ms. Mwangi holding brief for Kiminda for the applicant
N/A for the respondents.