[2020] KEHC 7048 (KLR)
The court found that the grant of letters of administration was obtained through concealment of material facts, specifically the exclusion of the purchaser's interest and the existence of a prior probate cause. There was sufficient documentary evidence that the deceased's land had been sold to Zakayo Achilu Ekirapa,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 7048 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: Jonathan Omuse Omadede; Applicant: Lawi Omadede; Protestor: Zakayo Ekirapa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Probate & Administration 266 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation or Annulment of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed; grant revoked; objector appointed administrator; files consolidated; costs to petitioner/respondent
- Judges
- KW Kiarie
- Legal Topics
- Succession Proceedings, Revocation of Grant, Concealment of Material Facts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jonathan Omuse Omadede
Respondent
Lawi Omadede
Applicant
Zakayo Ekirapa
Protestor
Procedural Posture
Probate Application / Ruling on Summons for Revocation or Annulment of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration was obtained fraudulently by concealment of material facts.
- 2 Whether the interests of a purchaser of the deceased's estate were improperly excluded from the succession proceedings.
- 3 Whether the existence of a prior probate cause affects the validity of the current grant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the grant of letters of administration was obtained through concealment of material facts, specifically the exclusion of the purchaser's interest and the existence of a prior probate cause. There was sufficient documentary evidence that the deceased's land had been sold to Zakayo Achilu Ekirapa, and the petitioner/respondent could not feign ignorance of this fact. The court held that the petitioner acted mischievously and out of selfishness by initiating parallel proceedings and failing to disclose the prior cause. As a result, the grant issued to Jonathan Omuse was revoked, and the objector was appointed as the new administrator. The court also ordered consolidation...
Court Disposition
application allowed; grant revoked; objector appointed administrator; files consolidated; costs to petitioner/respondent
Orders
- The grant issued on 13th February 2014 to Jonathan Omuse is revoked together with any consequential orders.
- The objector is appointed administrator of the estate of the deceased.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA
PROBATE & ADMINSTRATION NO.266 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF:
REUBEN OURETEN OMADEDE...................................................DECEASED
BETWEEN
JONATHAN OMUSE OMADEDE ................ PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT
AND
LAWI OMADEDE....................................................OBJECTOR/APPLICANT
ZAKAYO EKIRAPA .....................................................................PROTESTOR
RULING
1. The objector/applicant herein moved the court by way of summons for revocation or annulment of grant dated 25th February 2014 under section 76 of the Law of succession Act and Rule 44(1) of Probate and Succession Rules. He is seeking the following orders:
a) That the grant of letters of administration issued on 13th February 2014 to Jonathan Omuse be revoked and or annulled.
b) That all subsequent orders arising from and incidental to the said grant including the confirmation be nullified and set aside.
c) That the costs of this application be borne by the petitioner/respondent herein.
2. The application is premised on the following grounds:
a) That the institution of these Succession proceedings was deliberately concealed from the applicant/objector;
b) That the grant was obtained fraudulently by making of a false statement or by concealment from court of material facts;
c) That the purchaser of the entire estate of the deceased herein was never included in this succession cause and the action by the petitioner /respondent was deliberate;
d) That the petitioner/respondent herein as the administrator of the estate of the deceased’s estate failed to diligently and honestly administer the deceased’s estate;
e) That it is only fair and just if the interests of the purchaser of the deceased’s estate herein is put into consideration to ensure full, fair administration thereof;
f) That the grant as it is and the subsequent certificate of confirmation if issued is incapable of the proper operation without consideration of the purchaser’s interest in the estate mentioned above;
g) That the applicant/objector is the elder brother to both the deceased herein Reuben Omadede and the petitioner/respondent and makes this application as such; and
h) That in any event prior to the filing of this cause there existed a previous Probate cause namely Busia HCP & A. No. 252 of 2012 made and applied for by Taidora Amonyait Omadede who is also deceased and was a widow to the deceased herein and ranked in priority in administering the deceased’s estate.
3. The petitioner/respondent opposed the application on grounds that:
a) That the deceased herein and his widow did not sell any land to the protestor;
b) That the witnesses who testified about the sale deliberately misled the court.
4. I have perused the evidence affidavits, attached documents filed herein as well the oral evidence that was adduced and the following facts emerge:
a) That Reuben Oureten Omadede the deceased whose estate is contested and Taidora Amonyait Omadede, his widow, died without any issue.
b) That at the time of their deaths, the land parcel No. NORTH TESO/ ANGURAI 292 had been sold to Zakayo Achilu Ekirapa. There was sufficient documentary evidence to this effect. The petitioner cannot be allowed to feign ignorance.
5. Upon my perusal of High Court Probate and Administration file No. 252 of 2012, I noted that the petitioner therein is Taidora Amonyait Omadede and the petition was in respect of the estate of Reuben Oureten Omadede. The petitioner in this matter acted mischievously and it is clear he was prompted by selfishness. We cannot have two files in respect of the same estate.
6. I find the application merited. The grant issued on 13th February 2014 to Jonathan Omuse is hereby revoked together with any consequential orders. The objector herein is appointed administrator of the estate of the deceased. I also make and order that High Court Probate and Administration file No. 252 of 2012 be consolidated with this file.
7. The costs of this application to be borne by the petitioner/respondent.
DELIVERED and SIGNED at BUSIA this 8th day of April, 2020
KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE
JUDGE