[2024] KEHC 13041 (KLR)
The court found that the consent order dated 16th February 2023 required the parties to appoint their respective experts to jointly prepare and file a single report for the court's consideration. The report filed on 2nd May 2023 was prepared and signed by the experts appointed by both the Applicants and Respondents,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 13041 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jane Kanyua Njoroge; Applicant: Cecilia Muthoni Njoroge; Applicant: John Njoroge; Applicant: 2nd, 3rd, 8th, 10th and 11th Applicants (names not specified); Respondent: Respondents (names not specified)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Probate & Administration 127 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration / Ruling on Compliance With Consent Order Regarding Expert Reports and Distribution of Estate
- Outcome
- Application for acceptance of splinter report dismissed; joint report adopted for distribution of estate.
- Judges
- MA Odero
- Legal Topics
- Succession of Estates, Distribution of Intestate Estate, Joint Expert Reports, Compliance With Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Kanyua Njoroge
Applicant
Cecilia Muthoni Njoroge
Applicant
John Njoroge
Applicant
2nd, 3rd, 8th, 10th and 11th Applicants (names not specified)
Applicant
Respondents (names not specified)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Compliance With Consent Order Regarding Expert Reports and Distribution of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent order regarding appointment of joint experts was complied with.
- 2 Which expert report should be accepted by the court for the distribution of the estate.
- 3 Whether a splinter report by a subset of applicants is valid under the court's orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the consent order dated 16th February 2023 required the parties to appoint their respective experts to jointly prepare and file a single report for the court's consideration. The report filed on 2nd May 2023 was prepared and signed by the experts appointed by both the Applicants and Respondents, and there was no evidence that any party was excluded from its preparation. The separate report commissioned by a subset of Applicants was not provided for in the consent order and was not sanctioned by the court. Therefore, only the joint report filed on 2nd May 2023 is valid and forms the basis for the distribution of the estate. The court adopted this report and directed...
Court Disposition
Application for acceptance of splinter report dismissed; joint report adopted for distribution of estate.
Orders
- The report filed in court on 2nd May 2023 is adopted as the basis for distribution of the estate.
- The land known as LR Number 6336/2 Timau shall be formally surveyed and subdivided according to the adopted report.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
In re Estate of Richard Njoroge Njogu (Deceased) (Probate & Administration 127 of 1999) [2024] KEHC 13041 (KLR) (25 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13041 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nyeri
Probate & Administration 127 of 1999
MA Odero, J
October 25, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD NJOROGE NJOGU (DECEASED)
Ruling
1. The issue pending determination before this court is the question of the mode of distribution of the estate of the late Richard Njoroge Njogu who died intestate on 18th May 1998. A copy of the Death Certificate Serial Number 454593 was filed in Court on 4th March 1999. The Deceased was a polygamous man who had three (3) wives and several children.
2. Following the demise of the Deceased Grant of letters of Administration Intestate was on 31st July 2001 made to JAne Kanyua Njoroge, Cecilia Muthoni Njoroge And John Njoroge. The Grant was duly confirmed on 5th October 2004.
3. The Administrator John Mundia Njoroge filed a Chamber Summons dated 2nd June 2022 seeking to summon the Government Surveyor for cross-examination. That application was compromised by way of a consent dated 14th February 2023 which consent was adopted by the court on 16th February 2023.
4. The consent provided inter alia that“The Applicants and the Respondents at their own respective expenses to within 7 days of the date of this order appoint and instruct their separate experts being a surveyor and an agriculturist to work in conjunction for the purpose hereinafter specified.
5. The parties have been unable to agree on whether this consent has been fully complied with and which report should be accepted by the court.
6. The matter was canvassed by way of written submissions. The 2nd, 3rd, 8th, 10th and 11th Applicants filed the written submissions dated 9th July 2024, whilst the Respondents filed the written submissions dated 16th September 2024.
Analysis And Determination 7. The Surveyor and the Agriculturist were to visit and inspect the property known as LR Number 6336/ 2 Timau in order to demarcate the areas found to be very productive, medium productive and completely unproductive.
8. Pursuant to the consent the Respondents appointed one JOseph Gachagua Gathigi as their Agriculturist and Willy Kiama Muchemi as their surveyor. On their part the Applicants appointed JAson Gathumbi Ndegwa as Agriculturist and Douglas Gikonyo as the surveyor.
9. The two Agriculturists appointed by the parties prepared a joint report which they both signed
10. The Court order dated 16th February 2023 clearly provided that the parties were to jointly table before the Court drawn up by an Agriculturist and a Surveyor. The parties were to file in court a joint report. The joint report which was table in Court is the one which was filed in Court on 2nd May 2023.
11. The 2nd, 3rd, 8th, 10th and 11th Applicants however decided to commission their own separate report through their Advocate Mwangi Kariuki & Company Advocates which report was dated 5th April, 2024. This splinter report was not provided for in the Consent and was therefore not sanctioned by the Court. 12. The court orders only envisaged a report to be filed jointly by two parties namely the Applicants and the Respondents. No provision was made for a group of Applicants to file a separate report. The report filed in Court on 2nd May 2023 in my view includes all the Applicants and there is no indication that the 2nd, 3rd, 8th, 10th and 11th Applicants were excluded from the report filed on 2nd May 2023.
13. Accordingly I find that the report which is inclusive of all parties and which complies with the orders made by the Court on 16th February 2023 is the report filed in court on 2nd May 2023. I adopt the said report. I direct that the land be formally surveyed and sub-divided according to the report filed in court on 2nd May 2023. It is so ordered.
DATED IN NYERI THIS 25THDAY OF OCTOBER, 2024. MAUREEN A. ODEROJUDGE