[2018] KEHC 3493 (KLR)
The court found that the protestor's proposal for distribution of the estate, which allocated shares in parcel MAGUMONI/THUITA/544 to the sons and in parcel MAGUMONI/THUITA/729 to the daughters, was equitable and consistent with Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act. The court noted that all daughters, though...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 3493 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Madrine Ciamutegi Robert; Respondent: James Gitonga Robert
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 20 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- grant confirmed and estate distributed as per protestor's proposal
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant, Revocation of Grant, Beneficiary Entitlement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Madrine Ciamutegi Robert
Applicant
James Gitonga Robert
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the estate of the deceased should be distributed equally among all surviving dependants.
- 2 Whether the protestor's proposal for distribution aligns with the Law of Succession Act.
- 3 Whether married daughters are entitled to a share of the estate despite not staking a claim or renouncing their rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the protestor's proposal for distribution of the estate, which allocated shares in parcel MAGUMONI/THUITA/544 to the sons and in parcel MAGUMONI/THUITA/729 to the daughters, was equitable and consistent with Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act. The court noted that all daughters, though married and not present in court, had not renounced their rights and were therefore entitled to a share of the estate. The court confirmed the grant jointly issued to the administratrix and administrator and ordered the estate to be distributed as per the protestor's proposal, promoting peace and harmony within the family. No order as to costs was made, considering the family...
Court Disposition
grant confirmed and estate distributed as per protestor's proposal
Orders
- The grant jointly issued to Madrine Ciamutegi Robert and James Gitonga Robert on 18th December, 2017 is confirmed.
- The estate of the deceased shall be distributed as follows: L.R. NO. MAGUMONI/THUITA/544: Madrine Ciamutegi Robert - 1.90 acres (in trust for herself and five named daughters), James Gitonga Robert - 1.90 acres, Jediel Nyaga Robert - 1.90 acres, Alex Kithinji Robert - 1.90 acres, Jackson Muriuki Robert - 1.90 acres;...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
70 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT CHUKA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.20 OF 2017
(FORMERLY NYERI HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.19 OF 1983)
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT B. MATE KABIRO (DECEASED)
MADRINE CIAMUTEGI ROBERT............PETITIONER
VERSUS
JAMES GITONGA ROBERT.....................PROTESTOR
J U D G M E N T
1. This cause relates to the estate of the late ROBERT B. MATE KABIRO(Deceased) who died on 4th June 1983 at Embu Hospital. He was domiciled at Kabugua Market within Tharaka Nithi County. The deceased left the following dependants surviving him namely:-
(i) Madrine Ciamutegi Robert- widow
(ii) James Gitonga Robert
(iii) Mercy Muthoni Robert
(iv) Lucy Kanini Robert- (deceased)
(v) Jediel Nyaga Robert
(vi) Alex Kithinji Robert
(vii) Agnes Karimi Robert
(viii) Rosalid Gatakaa Mati
(ix) Purity Murugi Robert
(x) Irene Kagendi Robert
(xi) Jackson Muriuki Robert
2. The record of proceedings show that the deceased died intestate and his estate comprised the following properties;
a) L.R. NO. MAGUMONI/THUITA/544- measuring 9. 6 acres
b) L.R. NO. MAGUMONI/THUITA/729- measuring 6 acres
Madrine Ciamutegi Robert was appointed the administratrix of the estate of the deceased herein on 5th April, 1984 and it appears that she used the grant issued in Nyeri High Court to distribute the estate illegally. When this cause was transferred to this court, this court upon noting anormally revoked the grant and reversed the transactions . In the interest of time and justice, I do not find it useful to go back to the same at this stage. It suffices to note that on 18th December, 2017 upon revocation of grant, a fresh grant was issued jointly to both Madrine Ciamutegi Robert and James Gitonga Robert as 1st administratrix and 2nd administrator respectively.
3. The 1st administrator has through summons for confirmation of grant dated 18th December, 2017 sought confirmation of grant and proposed to have the estate distributed equally among all the surviving dependants. The 2nd administrator filed a protest suggesting that the estate should be distributed as follows:-
(i) L.R. MAGUMONI/THUITA/544
a) Madrine Ciamutegi Robert - 1. 9 acres
b) James Gitonga Robert - 1. 9. acres
c) Jediel Nyaga Robert - 1. 9 acres
d) Alex Kithinji Robert - 1. 9. acres
e) Jackson Muriuki Robert - 1. 9 acres
(ii) L.R. MAGUMONI/THUITA/729
a) Mercy Muthoni Robert - 1 acre
b) Agnes Karimi Robert - 1 acre
c) Rosalid Gatakaa Mati - 1 acre
d) Purity Murugi Robert - 1 acre
e) Irene Kagendi Robert - 1 acre
f) Muthomi Nthiga
g) Mutwiri Nthiga - 1 acre jointly
4. The 1 administratrix during hearing told this court that she is more interested with peace and tranquility in the family and that she was agreeable to her sons getting their respective shares in parcel No. MAGUMONI/THUITA/544 while her daughters should get their shares in parcel No. MAGUMONI/THUITA/729. I have looked at the proposal made by the protestor and that is exactly what he has proposed. I have noted that the protestor's proposal is equitable and meets the spirit of the law as provided under Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act. This court was told that the sons are in occupation of their respective shares in parcel No.544 and that they are contended with the share of 1. 6 acres initially given to them by the 1st administratrix. All the daughters of the deceased are said to be married and none turned up in court to stake a claim in the estate. They however did not renounce their rights as provided by law. They are therefore entitled to a share in the estate.
5. In the premises and purely for purposes of promoting peace and harmony in the family of the deceased I will allow the summons for confirmation of grant dated 18th December, 2017. The grant jointly issued to the administratrix and the administrator on 18th December, 2017 is hereby confirmed and the estate of the deceased herein shall be distributed as follows:
(i) L.R. NO. MAGUMONI/THUITA/544
a) Madrine Ciamutegi Robert - 1. 90 acres to be held for her own benefit and in trust of;
(i) Mercy Muthoni Robert
(ii) Agnes Karimi Robert
(iii) Rosalid Gatakaa Mati
(iv) Purity Murugi Robert and
(v) Ireen Kagendo Robert
(b) James Gitonga Robert - 1. 90 acres
(c) Jediel Nyaga Robert - 1. 90 acres
(d) Alex Kithinji Robert - 1. 90 acres
(e) Jackson Muriuki Robert - 1. 90 acres
(ii) L.R. MAGUMONI/THUITA/729
(a) Mercy Muthoni Robert - 1 acre
(b) Agnes Karimi Robert - 1 acre
(c) Rosalid Gatakaa Mati - 1 acre
(d) Purity Murugi Robert - 1 acre
(e) Ireen Kagendo Robert - 1 acre
(f) Muthoni Nthiga
Mutwiri Nthiga - 1 acre jointly
This being a family matter I shall make no order as to costs.
Dated, signed and delivered at Chuka this 16th day of October, 2018.
R.K. LIMO
JUDGE
16/10/2018
Judgment signed, dated and delivered in the open court in the presence of parties and Kaari for petitioner and Murithi holding brief for Mugo for applicant.
R.K. LIMO
JUDGE
16/10/2018