[2018] KEHC 5514 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 5514 (KLR)

The court found that the omission of the 5 acres out of L.R. No. Longonot/Kijabe Block 2/7683 from the certificate of confirmation of grant was an error within the meaning of Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. Since the deceased was a confirmed beneficiary...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 5514 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ruth Nyokabi Mwika; Respondent: Estate of Robert Mwika Nganga (Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 323 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant
Outcome
application allowed in part
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Omitted Assets, Probate and Administration, Consent of Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Rectification of Grant Omitted Assets Probate and Administration Consent of Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ruth Nyokabi Mwika

Applicant

Estate of Robert Mwika Nganga (Deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Rectification of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant can be rectified to include an asset omitted during the initial confirmation.
  2. 2 Whether omission of the deceased's share in his late father's estate is curable under Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission of the 5 acres out of L.R. No. Longonot/Kijabe Block 2/7683 from the certificate of confirmation of grant was an error within the meaning of Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 43(1) of the Probate and Administration Rules. Since the deceased was a confirmed beneficiary of the asset in his late father's estate and all beneficiaries consented to its inclusion, the court held that rectification was appropriate. However, as no proposal for distribution was made, the asset would remain undistributed until a fresh application for distribution, with the consent of all beneficiaries, was filed and considered by the court.

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • The application for inclusion of 5 acres in LR No. Longonot/Kijabe Block 2/7683 is allowed as prayed.
  • The asset will remain undistributed until a fresh application for its distribution is made with the consent of all beneficiaries.