[2020] KEHC 8426 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 8426 (KLR)

The court found that the orders made on 14th November 2018, which altered the distribution of the estate, were granted without notice to all beneficiaries, specifically the applicant and her siblings. There was no evidence that they were served with the application or hearing notice, nor was there a surveyor's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 8426 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Josephine Mucece; Applicant: Judith Karegi Mwenda
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 175 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review and Reinstatement of Prior Orders
Outcome
Application allowed; orders of 14th November 2018 set aside.
Legal Topics
Succession, Grant Rectification, Estate Distribution, Notice to Beneficiaries
Source Language
en
Family and Children Succession Grant Rectification Estate Distribution Notice to Beneficiaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josephine Mucece

Petitioner

Judith Karegi Mwenda

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review and Reinstatement of Prior Orders

  1. 1 Whether the orders made on 14th November 2018 regarding the distribution of the estate should be reviewed and set aside due to lack of notice to all beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether the subdivision and redistribution of LR Kiirua/Nkando/540 was conducted without proper service and consultation with all beneficiaries, particularly those of Morris Mwongera M’Twaruchiu.
  3. 3 Whether the share due to Morris Mwongera M’Twaruchiu should be specified and transmitted directly to his children.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the orders made on 14th November 2018, which altered the distribution of the estate, were granted without notice to all beneficiaries, specifically the applicant and her siblings. There was no evidence that they were served with the application or hearing notice, nor was there a surveyor's report to support the changes. The lack of notice and opportunity to be heard constituted a breach of the beneficiaries' rights under the Law of Succession Act and principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court set aside the orders of 14th November 2018, reinstating the prior position and ensuring that all beneficiaries are properly notified and heard in any future...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; orders of 14th November 2018 set aside.

Orders

  • Orders granted on 14th November 2018 are set aside.
  • Each party to bear their own costs.