[2023] KEHC 21302 (KLR)
The court found that the estate of the deceased, who had two wives and children from both houses, must be distributed in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act. The assets were to be divided among the houses based on the number of children and surviving wives, with each house treated as a unit. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 21302 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Tabu Samuel Kiponda; Applicant: Tumaini Samuel Kiponda; Respondent: Elikana Ngala Garama; Respondent: Zawadi Samuel Kiponda
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 110 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Distribution of Estate After Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Estate distributed among beneficiaries in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act; specific shares and allocations ordered.
- Judges
- SM Githinji
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Polygamous Estates, Distribution of Estate, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tabu Samuel Kiponda
Applicant
Tumaini Samuel Kiponda
Applicant
Elikana Ngala Garama
Respondent
Zawadi Samuel Kiponda
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Distribution of Estate After Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the estate of the deceased should be distributed in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act given the polygamous nature of the family.
- 2 How the assets of the deceased should be equitably distributed among the beneficiaries from both houses.
- 3 Whether prior transfers and undisclosed assets affect the distribution of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the estate of the deceased, who had two wives and children from both houses, must be distributed in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act. The assets were to be divided among the houses based on the number of children and surviving wives, with each house treated as a unit. The court noted that some assets had already been transferred to one house and that certain benefits and rental incomes were undisclosed. In the absence of consensus or proposals from the parties, the court exercised its discretion to distribute the estate equitably, allocating specific properties and benefits to the respective houses and beneficiaries as detailed in the ruling....
Court Disposition
Estate distributed among beneficiaries in accordance with section 40 of the Law of Succession Act; specific shares and allocations ordered.
Orders
- Plot No. Sokoke/Dida/968 to Martha Samuel Kiponda, Tabu Samuel Kiponda, Tumaini Samuel Kiponda, Penina Samuel Kiponda, and Constance Dama Samuel equally.
- Plot No. Kilifi/Mtondia/157 to Tabu Samuel Kiponda, Tumaini Samuel Kiponda, Penina Samuel Kiponda, Constance Dama Samuel, Elikana Ngala Garama, and Naomi Kabibi Garama equally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
In re Estate of Samuel Garama Kiponda alias Samuel Kiponda (Deceased) (Succession Cause 110 of 2013) [2023] KEHC 21302 (KLR) (27 July 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 21302 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Malindi
Succession Cause 110 of 2013
SM Githinji, J
July 27, 2023
Between
Tabu Samuel Kiponda
1st Petitioner
Tumaini Samuel Kiponda
2nd Petitioner
and
Elikana Ngala Garama
1st Objector
Zawadi Samuel Kiponda
2nd Objector
Ruling
1. This court made the following orders in the ruling dated 22 September 2022i.The grant issued to the Petitioners on 28 November 2018 and certificate of confirmation of the even date is hereby set aside.ii.The property Sokoke/Dida/1270 is part of the deceased’s estate.iii.The parties to file consent on distribution within 30 days from dates herein or file separate proposals on distribution within same span in default court to go ahead and make verdict with or without parties input.iv.Parties to bear their costs.
2. The parties herein failed to file any proposal on the mode of distribution as directed. When this matter came up for directions on 12 June 2023, Mr. Miller, counsel for the Petitioners told the court that the parties had failed to agree on distribution for the reason that some of the beneficiaries were not entitled to inherit. Mr. Miller prayed for a hearing date before the estate could be distributed.
3. Miss Mwangi, opposing counsel, contested that, that has been the petitioners’ position since 2013. That the court should proceed on the availed evidence and pleadings filed.
4. As already established in the aforementioned ruling, the deceased during his lifetime had two wives; Martha Samuel Kiponda and Zawadi Samuel Kiponda. A perusal of the pleadings herein and affidavit of Elikana Ngala establishes that Martha’s children were; -i. Tabu Samuel Kipondaii. Tumaini Samuel Kipondaiii. Penina Samuel Kipondaiv. Constance Dama SamuelZawadi’s children; -i. Elikana Ngala Garamaii. Naomi Kabibi Garama
5. As per the petitioners’ affidavit for summons of confirmation of grant, and the ruling delivered by this court on 22 September 2022, the deceased’s estate comprises of the following assets; - 1. Plot. No. Sokoke/Dida/968 measuring 3. 59Ha
2. Plot No. Kilifi/Mtondia/157 measuring 13 acres
3. Plot No. Sokoke/Dida/1270 measuring 3. 65Ha
4. House at Kisauni on Plot No. 90/I/MN
5. House at Kilifi
6. Employment benefits at Ministry of Finance-customs department
7. Benefits at NSSF
6. The applicable law governing the estate herein is section 40 of the Law of Succession Act cap 160 which states that;1. Where an intestate has married more than once under any system of law permitting polygamy, his personal and household effects and the residue of the net intestate estate shall, in the first instance, be divided among the houses according to the number of children in each house, but also adding any wife surviving him as an additional unit to the number of children.
2. The distribution of the personal and household effects and the residue of the net intestate estate within each house shall then be in accordance with the rules set out in sections 35 to 38.
7. It must also be noted that in this kind of proceedings, it is not possible to achieve equality but at least some equity must be attained.
8. Notably, the Objectors disclosed in the aforementioned affidavit by Elikana that Plot. No. Sokoke/Dida/968 had already been transferred to Martha and her children. The benefits held at the Ministry of Finance and NSSF were not disclosed. It was also not clear as to the amount of rent being collected from the two houses in Kisauni and Kilifi. It is my finding, given the available information that the distribution be as follows; -DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY HEIRS SHARES
Plot. No. Sokoke/Dida/968- 3. 59Ha Martha Samuel KipondaTabu Samuel KipondaTumaini Samuel KipondaPenina Samuel KipondaConstance Dama Samuel Equally
Plot No. Kilifi/Mtondia/157- 13 acres Tabu Samuel KipondaTumaini Samuel KipondaPenina Samuel Kiponda Constance Dama SamuelElikana Ngala GaramaNaomi Kabibi Garama Equally
Plot No. Sokoke/Dida/1270-3. 65Ha Zawadi Samuel KipondaElikana Ngala GaramaNaomi Kabibi Garama Equally
House at Kisauni on Plot No. 90/I/MN Martha Samuel Kiponda Absolute
House at Kilifi Zawadi Samuel Kiponda Absolute
Employment benefits at Ministry of Finance Martha Samuel KipondaTabu Samuel KipondaTumaini Samuel KipondaPenina Samuel Kiponda Constance Dama SamuelZawadi Samuel KipondaElikana Ngala GaramaNaomi Kabibi Garama Equally
Benefits at NSSF Martha Samuel KipondaTabu Samuel KipondaTumaini Samuel KipondaPenina Samuel Kiponda Constance Dama SamuelZawadi Samuel KipondaElikana Ngala GaramaNaomi Kabibi Garama Equally
RULING READ, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT MALINDI THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2023. ...................................S.M. GITHINJIJUDGEIn the absence of; -1. Miss Mwangi for the Interested Parties2. Mr Miller for the Respondent