[2019] KEHC 2287 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2287 (KLR)

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to order the reversion of the two registered properties (L.R. LAIKIPIA/DAIGA/ETHI BLOCK 2/69 and L.R. DAIGA/UMANDE BLOCK 10/281) to the deceased's estate, as any claim to those properties would require separate civil proceedings to resolve title disputes. However, regarding...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2287 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Loise Makandi M'Twaruchiu; Respondent: Charity Kaburo M'Twaruchiu; Respondent: Julius Kithinji M'Twaruchiu; Respondent: Jackson Wanjohi Ndinah
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nanyuki
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 7 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Cancellation of Titles and Reversion to Estate
Outcome
Application allowed in part; granted only in respect to Unsurveyed Residential A5 Plot No 43. Dismissed as to the other two properties. Each party to bear own costs.
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Administration of Estates, Revocation of Grant, Intermeddling With Estate, Sale of Estate Property, Jurisdiction of Succession Court
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Administration of Estates Revocation of Grant Intermeddling With Estate Sale of Estate Property Jurisdiction of Succession Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Loise Makandi M'Twaruchiu

Applicant

Charity Kaburo M'Twaruchiu

Respondent

Julius Kithinji M'Twaruchiu

Respondent

Jackson Wanjohi Ndinah

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Cancellation of Titles and Reversion to Estate

  1. 1 Whether the court should cancel titles to certain properties and revert them to the deceased's estate for proper distribution.
  2. 2 Whether the succession court has jurisdiction to determine ownership of disputed properties registered in the names of survivors.
  3. 3 Whether the sale of estate property by administrators before confirmation of grant is valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to order the reversion of the two registered properties (L.R. LAIKIPIA/DAIGA/ETHI BLOCK 2/69 and L.R. DAIGA/UMANDE BLOCK 10/281) to the deceased's estate, as any claim to those properties would require separate civil proceedings to resolve title disputes. However, regarding Unsurveyed Residential A5 Plot No 43, it was undisputed that the property belonged to the deceased and was sold by the administrators before confirmation of grant, contrary to the Law of Succession Act. The administrators had no legal authority to sell the property, and thus no valid title passed to the purchaser. The court therefore ordered that this property revert to the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; granted only in respect to Unsurveyed Residential A5 Plot No 43. Dismissed as to the other two properties. Each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The title to Unsurveyed Residential A5 Plot No 43 is cancelled and the property shall revert to the deceased's estate for distribution.
  • The application for cancellation of titles in respect to L.R. LAIKIPIA/DAIGA/ETHI BLOCK 2/69 and L.R. DAIGA/UMANDE BLOCK 10/281 (TIMAU) is dismissed.