[2021] KEHC 1812 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 1812 (KLR)

The court found that the protest to the grant of letters of administration had previously been dismissed, and that the current issue was the confirmation of the grant and the need for an additional administrator due to the size of the estate and concerns of wastage. The court exercised its discretion to direct the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 1812 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Eunice Chelangat Kimetto; Respondent: Ishmael Chepkwony; Respondent: Pamela Chepkwony; Respondent: Alice Chepkwony
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 7 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Directions After Protest and Before Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
directions issued; matter stood over for mention; summons to issue to all beneficiaries
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Letters of Administration, Confirmation of Grant, Appointment of Administrator
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Succession of Estates Letters of Administration Confirmation of Grant Appointment of Administrator

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eunice Chelangat Kimetto

Applicant

Ishmael Chepkwony

Respondent

Pamela Chepkwony

Respondent

Alice Chepkwony

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Directions After Protest and Before Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the protest to the grant of letters of administration should be upheld or dismissed.
  2. 2 Whether an additional administrator should be appointed for the estate.
  3. 3 Whether the summons for confirmation and rectification are properly before the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the protest to the grant of letters of administration had previously been dismissed, and that the current issue was the confirmation of the grant and the need for an additional administrator due to the size of the estate and concerns of wastage. The court exercised its discretion to direct the family to agree on a second administrator and set a mention date for further directions, ensuring that all beneficiaries are notified. The court's directions were aimed at facilitating the proper administration of the estate and protecting the interests of all parties involved.

Court Disposition

directions issued; matter stood over for mention; summons to issue to all beneficiaries

Orders

  • The family to agree on a second administrator.
  • Matter to be mentioned on 15/12/2021 for directions.